Publicação:
Flexural strength of acrylic resin repairs processed by different methods: water bath, microwave energy and chemical polymerization

dc.contributor.authorArioli Filho, João Neudenir [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorButignon, Luis Eduardo [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPereira, Rodrigo de Paula [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorLucas, Matheus Guilherme [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMollo Junior, Francisco de Assis [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:46:29Z
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:46:29Z
dc.date.issued2011-05-01
dc.description.abstractDenture fractures are common in daily practice, causing inconvenience to the patient and to the dentists. Denture repairs should have adequate strength, dimensional stability and color match, and should be easily and quickly performed as well as relatively inexpensive. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the flexural strength of acrylic resin repairs processed by different methods: warm water-bath, microwave energy, and chemical polymerization. Material and methods: Sixty rectangular specimens (31x10x2.5 mm) were made with warm water-bath acrylic resin (Lucitone 550) and grouped (15 specimens per group) according to the resin type used to make repair procedure: 1) specimens of warm water-bath resin (Lucitone 550) without repair (control group); 2) specimens of warm water-bath resin repaired with warm water-bath; 3) specimens of warm water-bath resin repaired with microwave resin (Acron MC); 4) specimens of warm water-bath resin repaired with autopolymerized acrylic resin (Simplex). Flexural strength was measured with the three-point bending in a universal testing machine (MTS 810 Material Test System) with load cell of 100 kgf under constant speed of 5 mm/min. Data were analyzed statistically by Kruskal-Wallis test (p<0.05). Results: The control group showed the best result (156.04 +/- 1.82 MPa). Significant differences were found among repaired specimens and the results were decreasing as follows: group 3 (43.02 +/- 2.25 MPa), group 2 (36.21 +/- 1.20 MPa) and group 4 (6.74 +/- 0.85 MPa). Conclusion: All repaired specimens demonstrated lower flexural strength than the control group. Repairs with autopolymerized acrylic resin showed the lowest flexural strength.en
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State Univ, Araraquara Dent Sch, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Araraquara, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State Univ, Araraquara Dent Sch, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Araraquara, SP, Brazil
dc.format.extent249-253
dc.identifierhttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572011000300013&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Applied Oral Science. Bauru-sp: Univ São Paulo Fac Odontologia Bauru, v. 19, n. 3, p. 249-253, 2011.
dc.identifier.fileS1678-77572011000300013.pdf
dc.identifier.issn1678-7757
dc.identifier.lattes6380225075834021
dc.identifier.scieloS1678-77572011000300013
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/16462
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000291055000013
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherUniversidade de São Paulo (USP), Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Applied Oral Science
dc.relation.ispartofjcr1.709
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,645
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectFlexural strengthen
dc.subjectDenture fractureen
dc.subjectDenture repairen
dc.titleFlexural strength of acrylic resin repairs processed by different methods: water bath, microwave energy and chemical polymerizationen
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.licensehttp://www.scielo.br/revistas/jaos/paboutj.htm
dcterms.rightsHolderUniv São Paulo Fac Odontologia Bauru
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.lattes6380225075834021
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-0742-2145[5]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araraquarapt
unesp.departmentMateriais Odontológicos e Prótese - FOARpt

Arquivos

Pacote Original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
S1678-77572011000300013.pdf
Tamanho:
304.83 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descrição:

Licença do Pacote

Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Nome:
license.txt
Tamanho:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descrição:
Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Nome:
license.txt
Tamanho:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descrição: