Logo do repositório

Genotypic profile of Staphylococcus spp., Enterococcus spp., and E. coli colonizing dogs, surgeons, and environment during the intraoperative period: a cross-sectional study in a veterinary teaching hospital in Brazil

dc.contributor.authorPossa de Menezes, Mareliza [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorVedovelli Cardozo, Marita [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPereira, Natália [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBugov, Mariana [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorVerbisck, Newton Valerio
dc.contributor.authorCastro, Vanessa
dc.contributor.authorFigueiredo de Castro Nassar, Alessandra
dc.contributor.authorCastro Moraes, Paola [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionEmpresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA)
dc.contributor.institutionBiological Institute
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T18:37:07Z
dc.date.issued2025-03-06
dc.description.abstractAIMS: This prospective cross-sectional study aimed to determine the occurrence of resistance genes and genetic diversity in Staphylococcus spp., Enterococcus spp., and Escherichia coli isolated from dogs' superficial surgical site (SS), surgeons' hands, and the operating room (OR) during the intraoperative period. METHODS: Thirty dogs undergoing clean/clean-contaminated (G1, n = 20) and contaminated surgeries (G2, n = 10), along with eight surgeons, were included in the study. Specimens were collected using sterile swabs, transported in 0.1% peptone salt solution, and spread onto blood agar. Environmental samples were collected through passive exposure using BHI agar plates. Seventy-five isolates were selected and classified using MALDI-TOF MS. Resistance genes were screened via PCR: tet(M), ermA, aacA-aphD, blaZ, mecA, blaTEM-1, blaSHV, blaSHV-1, blaCTX-M-1, 3 e 15, blaCTX-M-2, blaCMY-2, mcr1, mcr2, mcr3, mcr4, and ndm. Genetic diversity was assessed through PFGE analysis using SmaI and XbaI restriction enzymes, with clustering performed by the UPGMA method. The chi-square test compared the frequency of resistance gene detected. RESULTS: Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (83.33%), Enterococcus spp. (52.63%), and E. coli (62.50%) were more frequently isolated from dogs' skin, while coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS; 62.50%) were more frequent in the OR. Resistance genes detected in Staphylococcus spp. included blaZ (79.17%), mecA (43.75%), tet(M) (41.67%), and aacA-aphD (25%). Among Enterococcus spp., tet(M) (78.95%) and blaZ (10.53%) were identified. S. pseudintermedius harbored tet(M) and aacA-aphD genes more frequently than CoNS. No E. coli isolates tested positive for the investigated genes. Twenty-four PFGE banding patterns were observed in CoNS (24/24), 15 in S. pseudintermedius (15/24), 4 in E. coli (4/8), and 7 in Enterococcus spp. (7/19). Genetically related S. pseudintermedius and E. coli were obtained from SS and OR in G2. Seven indistinguishable Enterococcus spp. were identified across different procedures and patients. CONCLUSION: Our study revealed high rates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus spp. and tetracycline-resistant Enterococcus spp. colonizing the environment in a veterinary teaching hospital in Brazil. PFGE analysis indicated a high diversity of CoNS and Enterococcus spp. Genetically related strains in S. pseudintermedius, Enterococcus spp., and E. coli emphasize the importance of effective infection control policies to minimize the spread of resistant bacteria.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Clinic and Veterinary Surgery School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Pathology Reproduction One Health School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationEmbrapa Beef Cattle
dc.description.affiliationResearch and Development Center in Animal Health General Bacteriology Laboratory Biological Institute
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Clinic and Veterinary Surgery School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Pathology Reproduction One Health School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2019/20585-0
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2021/13122-3
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCNPq: 307791/2021-1
dc.format.extent147
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-025-04611-4
dc.identifier.citationBMC veterinary research, v. 21, n. 1, p. 147-, 2025.
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12917-025-04611-4
dc.identifier.issn1746-6148
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-86000680879
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/298442
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofBMC veterinary research
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectEpidemiological surveillance
dc.subjectGenetic diversity
dc.subjectMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus spp.
dc.subjectMultidrug-resistant bacteria
dc.subjectTetracycline-resistant Enterococcus spp.
dc.titleGenotypic profile of Staphylococcus spp., Enterococcus spp., and E. coli colonizing dogs, surgeons, and environment during the intraoperative period: a cross-sectional study in a veterinary teaching hospital in Brazilen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication3d807254-e442-45e5-a80b-0f6bf3a26e48
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery3d807254-e442-45e5-a80b-0f6bf3a26e48
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Jaboticabalpt

Arquivos