Logo do repositório

Comparison of different polishing methods on the surface roughness of microhybrid, microfill, and nanofill composite resins

dc.contributor.authorModa, Mariana D. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGodas, Andre Gustavo de L. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorFernandes, Juliana C. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSuzuki, Thais Y. U. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGuedes, Ana Paula A. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBriso, André Luiz Fraga [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBedran-Russo, Ana Karina
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Paulo Henrique dos [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniv Illinois
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-26T17:45:05Z
dc.date.available2018-11-26T17:45:05Z
dc.date.issued2018-02-01
dc.description.abstractAim: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of different polishing methods on the surface roughness of resin-based composites subjected to a thermocycling procedure. Methods: A total of 192 specimens were divided into 24 groups, according to composite materials (Filtek Z250, Point 4, Renamel Nanofill, Filtek Supreme Plus, Renamel Microfill, and Premise) and finishing and polishing systems (Sof-Lex Pop On, Super Snap, Flexidisc, and Flexidisc+Enamelize). The specimens were subjected to thermocycling (5000 cycles). Results: Filtek Supreme Plus showed the lowest surface roughness values before thermocycling. After thermocycling, Filtek Supreme Plus continued to have the lowest surface roughness, with a statistically-significant difference for the other materials. After thermocycling, there was no statistically-significant difference among all the polishing techniques studied. Conclusions: The thermocycling was concluded as being able to change composite resins' surface roughness, whereas different finishing and polishing methods did not result in surface roughness changes after thermocycling.en
dc.description.affiliationSao Paulo State Univ, Aracatuba Sch Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, Aracatuba, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationSao Paulo State Univ, Aracatuba Sch Dent, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Aracatuba, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Illinois, Dept Restorat Dent, Chicago, IL USA
dc.description.affiliationUnespSao Paulo State Univ, Aracatuba Sch Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, Aracatuba, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespSao Paulo State Univ, Aracatuba Sch Dent, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Aracatuba, Brazil
dc.format.extent9
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jicd.12287
dc.identifier.citationJournal Of Investigative And Clinical Dentistry. Hoboken: Wiley, v. 9, n. 1, 9 p., 2018.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jicd.12287
dc.identifier.issn2041-1618
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/163815
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000424272100024
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Investigative And Clinical Dentistry
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,433
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restritopt
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectcomposite resin
dc.subjectpolishing method
dc.subjectsurface roughness
dc.subjectsurface smoothness
dc.subjectthermocycling
dc.titleComparison of different polishing methods on the surface roughness of microhybrid, microfill, and nanofill composite resinsen
dc.typeArtigopt
dcterms.licensehttp://olabout.wiley.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-406071.html
dcterms.rightsHolderWiley-Blackwell
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isDepartmentOfPublication5f53b343-da2a-4737-96ec-6e2389a6d704
relation.isDepartmentOfPublication.latestForDiscovery5f53b343-da2a-4737-96ec-6e2389a6d704
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication8b3335a4-1163-438a-a0e2-921a46e0380d
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery8b3335a4-1163-438a-a0e2-921a46e0380d
unesp.author.lattes5761956467234702[6]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-6126-1760[6]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araçatubapt
unesp.departmentMateriais odontológicos e Prótese - FOApt
unesp.departmentOdontologia Restauradora - FOApt

Arquivos