Atenção!


O atendimento às questões referentes ao Repositório Institucional será interrompido entre os dias 20 de dezembro de 2025 a 4 de janeiro de 2026.

Pedimos a sua compreensão e aproveitamos para desejar boas festas!

Logo do repositório

Repetitive peripheral sensory stimulation for motor recovery after stroke: a scoping review

dc.contributor.authorFernanda Silva, Gabrielly
dc.contributor.authorCampos, Lorrane Freitas
dc.contributor.authorde Aquino Miranda, Jéssica Mariana
dc.contributor.authorGuirro Zuliani, Flávia
dc.contributor.authorde Souza Fonseca, Bruno Henrique
dc.contributor.authorde Araújo, Amaro Eduardo Tavares
dc.contributor.authorde Melo, Priscilla Flávia
dc.contributor.authorSuzuki, Luiz Gustavo
dc.contributor.authorAniceto, Luiz Paulo
dc.contributor.authorBazan, Rodrigo [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSande de Souza, Luciane Aparecida Pascucci
dc.contributor.authorLuvizutto, Gustavo José
dc.contributor.institutionHospital de Base do Distrito Federal
dc.contributor.institutionFederal University of Triângulo Mineiro
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T18:58:21Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-01
dc.description.abstractBackground and Purpose: Enhancing afferent information from the paretic limb can improve post-stroke motor recovery. However, uncertainties exist regarding varied sensory peripheral neuromodulation protocols and their specific impacts. This study outlines the use of repetitive peripheral sensory stimulation (RPSS) and repetitive magnetic stimulation (rPMS) in individuals with stroke. Methods: This scoping review was conducted according to the JBI Evidence Synthesis guidelines. We searched studies published until June 2023 on several databases using a three-step analysis and categorization of the studies: pre-analysis, exploration of the material, and data processing. Results: We identified 916 studies, 52 of which were included (N = 1,125 participants). Approximately 53.84% of the participants were in the chronic phase, displaying moderate-to-severe functional impairment. Thirty-two studies used RPSS often combining it with task-oriented training, while 20 used rPMS as a standalone intervention. The RPSS primarily targeted the median and ulnar nerves, stimulating for an average of 92.78 min at an intensity that induced paresthesia. RPMS targeted the upper and lower limb paretic muscles, employing a 20 Hz frequency in most studies. The mean stimulation time was 12.74 min, with an intensity of 70% of the maximal stimulator output. Among the 114 variables analyzed in the 52 studies, 88 (77.20%) were in the “s,b” domain, with 26 (22.8%) falling under the “d” domain of the ICF. Discussion and Conclusion: Sensory peripheral neuromodulation protocols hold the potential for enhancing post-stroke motor recovery, yet optimal outcomes were obtained when integrated with intensive or task-oriented motor training.en
dc.description.affiliationPhysical Therapy Division Hospital de Base do Distrito Federal
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Applied Physical Therapy Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Neurology Psychology and Psychiatry Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Neurology Psychology and Psychiatry Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo
dc.format.extent723-737
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2024.2322890
dc.identifier.citationTopics in Stroke Rehabilitation, v. 31, n. 7, p. 723-737, 2024.
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/10749357.2024.2322890
dc.identifier.issn1945-5119
dc.identifier.issn1074-9357
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85187109378
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/301458
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofTopics in Stroke Rehabilitation
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectelectric stimulation therapy
dc.subjectrehabilitation
dc.subjectrepetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation
dc.subjectrepetitive peripheral sensory stimulation
dc.subjectStroke
dc.subjectsystematic review
dc.titleRepetitive peripheral sensory stimulation for motor recovery after stroke: a scoping reviewen
dc.typeResenhapt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationa3cdb24b-db92-40d9-b3af-2eacecf9f2ba
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoverya3cdb24b-db92-40d9-b3af-2eacecf9f2ba
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-9978-9336[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-5389-3488[2]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-5306-5404[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-0715-6791[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-9955-6049[5]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-3447-8681[6]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-6560-2385[7]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-7317-8630[9]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-3872-308X[10]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-7160-9556[11]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-6914-7225[12]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Medicina, Botucatupt

Arquivos