Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Comparison of diferent diagnostic tests in dogs uninfected and naturally infected with visceral leishmaniasis

dc.contributor.authorSassaki, C. Y. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorColodel, M. M. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorFerreira, I. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorNogueira, F. S.
dc.contributor.authorLucheis, Simone Baldini [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorLangoni, Hélio [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorRocha, Noeme Sousa [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionEducational Foundation of Andradina (FEA)
dc.contributor.institutionAgência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios (APTA)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:26:00Z
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:26:00Z
dc.date.issued2011-09-19
dc.description.abstractUninfected dogs (n = 10) and those naturally infected with leishmaniasis (n = 10) were subjected to several diagnostic tests, namely: hemoculture, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of hemoculture, indirect immunofuorescence (RIFI), cytological examination of lymph node aspirate, culture of lymph node aspirate and PCR of lymph node aspirate. RIFI - followed by PCR of lymph node aspirate culture - presented more positive results in infected dogs than in uninfected ones. In infected animals, RIFI was more efective than PCR of lymph node aspirate culture. There was no statistical diference in positivity between RIFI and hemoculture; lymph node aspirate culture/cytological examination of lymph node aspirate and PCR of hemoculture; and between PCR of lymph node aspirate culture and PCR of hemoculture. All infected and uninfected animals had positive and negative results in at least one test. In conclusion, the association of several tests improves the efcacy of canine visceral leishmaniasis diagnosis.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Clinical Veterinary Medicine School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Husbandry Sao Paulo State University (Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)), Botucatu, Sao Paulo State
dc.description.affiliationSchool of Veterinary Medicine Educational Foundation of Andradina (FEA), Andradina, Sao Paulo State
dc.description.affiliationSao Paulo Agency of Agribusiness Technology (APTA), Bauru, Sao Paulo State
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Veterinary Hygiene and Public Health School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Husbandry Sao Paulo State University (Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)), Botucatu, Sao Paulo State
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Clinical Veterinary Medicine School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Husbandry Sao Paulo State University (Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)), Botucatu, Sao Paulo State
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Veterinary Hygiene and Public Health School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Husbandry Sao Paulo State University (Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)), Botucatu, Sao Paulo State
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipFort Dodge Animal Health
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2005/56765-9
dc.format.extent348-352
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-91992011000300015
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Venomous Animals and Toxins Including Tropical Diseases, v. 17, n. 3, p. 348-352, 2011.
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/S1678-91992011000300015
dc.identifier.fileS1678-91992011000300015-en.pdf
dc.identifier.issn1678-9180
dc.identifier.issn1678-9199
dc.identifier.lattes5326072118518067
dc.identifier.lattes6077735918469284
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-8188-8149
dc.identifier.scieloS1678-91992011000300015
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-80052735361
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/132313
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000294438900014
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Centro de Estudos de Venenos e Animais Peçonhentos (CEVAP)
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Venomous Animals and Toxins Including Tropical Diseases
dc.relation.ispartofjcr1.782
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,573
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectDiagnosis
dc.subjectDogs
dc.subjectVisceral leishmaniasis
dc.subjectAnimal experiment
dc.subjectAnimal parasitosis
dc.subjectAspiration cytology
dc.subjectBlood culture
dc.subjectControlled study
dc.subjectDiagnostic test
dc.subjectDifferential diagnosis
dc.subjectDog
dc.subjectImmunofluorescence
dc.subjectLaboratory diagnosis
dc.subjectLeishmania
dc.subjectLymph node biopsy
dc.subjectNonhuman
dc.subjectPolymerase chain reaction
dc.subjectVisceral leishmaniasis
dc.subjectAnimalia
dc.subjectCanis familiaris
dc.titleComparison of diferent diagnostic tests in dogs uninfected and naturally infected with visceral leishmaniasisen
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.licensehttp://www.scielo.br/revistas/jvatitd/iaboutj.htm
dcterms.rightsHolderCevap-unesp
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.lattes5326072118518067
unesp.author.lattes6077735918469284
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-8188-8149
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Botucatupt
unesp.departmentClínica Veterinária - FMVZpt
unesp.departmentHigiene Veterinária e Saúde Pública - FMVZpt

Arquivos

Pacote Original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
S1678-91992011000300015-en.pdf
Tamanho:
170.62 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descrição: