Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Lesions in Shotokan Karate and Jiu-Jitsu - direct trauma versus indirect

dc.contributor.authorde Souza, José Mario Couto
dc.contributor.authorFaim, Flavio Tomazelli
dc.contributor.authorNakashima, Inês Yoshie
dc.contributor.authorAltruda, Carla Regina
dc.contributor.authorMedeiros, Wladimir Musetti
dc.contributor.authorda Silva, Leandro Reis
dc.contributor.institutionEnéas de Siqueira Neto
dc.contributor.institutionMultidisciplinary Center of Sports Rehabilitation - Cemare
dc.contributor.institutionStudy Group in Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology - GERFE
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-28T18:56:52Z
dc.date.available2022-04-28T18:56:52Z
dc.date.issued2011-01-01
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Karate and Jiu-Jitsu are martial arts sharing a common origin but showing distinct movement biomechanics. The main features of Shotokan Karate are the impact blows, whereas Jiu-Jitsu utilizes projections, strangulations, torsions and immobilizations. These differences can provoke different sites of lesion. Objective: To verify the frequency of lesions in Karate and Jiu-Jitsu and confront their respective lesions between the two studied groups. Methods: Ninety-four athletes from three different competitive levels (international, national and state) were transversally evaluated through an open-closed-question questionnaire. Data regarding starting age and period of training were also assessed. The T-Student test and Chi-Square test were applied for the group comparison. Statistically significant differences were considered when p<0,05. Results: 148 lesions were reported from a sample of 53 karate players, and 160 lesions from 41 Jiu-Jitsu athletes. The most frequency site of lesion in karate was the hands and fingers (15.5%) and, in Jiu- Jitsu, the knees (16.3%). The places which presented significant differences between the two groups were: legs (p=0.042), mouth and teeth (p=0,028), neck (p=0,038), shoulder (p=0,000), elbow (p=0,001), and ear (p=0,000). Conclusion: Karate and Jiu-Jitsu show differences as regards frequency and incidence of lesion sites. These findings contribute to the elaboration of specific preventive and therapeutic measures for each sport.en
dc.description.affiliationSanto Amaro University,UNISA Enéas de Siqueira Neto, 340 - Vila São José, 04829-300, - São Paulo, SP
dc.description.affiliationMultidisciplinary Center of Sports Rehabilitation - Cemare
dc.description.affiliationStudy Group in Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology - GERFE
dc.description.affiliationFederal University of São Paulo - Unifesp
dc.format.extent107-110
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1517-86922011000200007
dc.identifier.citationRevista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte, v. 17, n. 2, p. 107-110, 2011.
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/S1517-86922011000200007
dc.identifier.issn1517-8692
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-79959741798
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/219674
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofRevista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectLesion
dc.subjectMartial arts
dc.subjectRehabilitation
dc.subjectSport
dc.titleLesions in Shotokan Karate and Jiu-Jitsu - direct trauma versus indirecten
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication

Arquivos

Coleções