Logo do repositório

Sprouting Control Treatment with LED Lights Does Not Affect the Biochemical Aspects of ‘Asterix’ Potatoes

dc.contributor.authorPedrosa, Vanessa Maria Dantas
dc.contributor.authorIzidoro, Maiqui
dc.contributor.authorda Silva, Maryelle Barros
dc.contributor.authorda Silva, Francisco Ronaldo Cardoso [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCecilio Filho, Arthur Bernardes
dc.contributor.authorCarvalho, Rogério Falleiros [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBacha, Allan Lopes [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorTeixeira, Gustavo Henrique de Almeida
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Idaho (U of I)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T18:43:26Z
dc.date.issued2025-01-01
dc.description.abstractRecently, it was observed that red, blue and far-red lights and different intensities (0.1 and 1.0 μmol m−2 s−1) of light-emitting diode (LED) reduced potato sprout growth but did not effectively inhibit sprouting in physiologically aged tubers. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the physiological and biochemical changes and sprout development in potatoes treated with LED lights or with 3-chlorophenyl carbamate (CIPC). To achieve this, ‘Asterix’ potatoes were harvested, cured at 15 °C (90–93% RH) for 15 days and treated with red (5 µmol m−2 s−1), far-red (5 µmol m−2 s−1) and blue (1 µmol m−2 s−1) LED lights, in addition to the negative control (dark) and positive control (0.022 g L−1 of CIPC) treatments. Potatoes from the light treatments were exposed to LED lights 24 h a day throughout the storage period, under optimal conditions for sprout development (16.7 ± 1 °C and 91.5 ± 1% RH). Tubers treated with blue and far-red LED light exhibited longer dormancy, fewer sprouts and smaller sprouts over the storage period. The carbohydrate content (starch and reducing sugars) was not affected by light treatments; however, total soluble sugar content was lower in tubers kept in the dark and higher in those treated with far-red LED light, which was not related to sprouting control. Therefore, it is suggested that other signalling mechanisms may be involved in sprout control using LED lights.en
dc.description.affiliationKimberly Research and Extension Center University of Idaho (U of I), 3806 N 3600 E
dc.description.affiliationFaculdade de Ciências Agrárias E Veterinárias (FCAV) Campus de Jaboticabal Departamento de Produção Vegetal Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Via de Acesso Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane S/N, SP
dc.description.affiliationUnespFaculdade de Ciências Agrárias E Veterinárias (FCAV) Campus de Jaboticabal Departamento de Produção Vegetal Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Via de Acesso Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane S/N, SP
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11540-024-09844-8
dc.identifier.citationPotato Research.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11540-024-09844-8
dc.identifier.issn1871-4528
dc.identifier.issn0014-3065
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85218111432
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/299760
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofPotato Research
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBlue light
dc.subjectCarbohydrates
dc.subjectFar-red light
dc.subjectPotato dormancy
dc.subjectRed light
dc.subjectSprouting
dc.titleSprouting Control Treatment with LED Lights Does Not Affect the Biochemical Aspects of ‘Asterix’ Potatoesen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication3d807254-e442-45e5-a80b-0f6bf3a26e48
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery3d807254-e442-45e5-a80b-0f6bf3a26e48
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-7179-080X[8]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Jaboticabalpt

Arquivos