Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Clinical Comparison of Two Photosensitizers for Oral Cavity Decontamination

dc.contributor.authorDonato, Hérica Adad Ricci [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPratavieira, Sebastião
dc.contributor.authorGrecco, Clovis
dc.contributor.authorBrugnera-Júnior, Aldo
dc.contributor.authorBagnato, Vanderlei Salvador
dc.contributor.authorKurachi, Cristina
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.institutionCamilo Castelo Branco University
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T16:45:46Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T16:45:46Z
dc.date.issued2017-02-01
dc.description.abstractObjective: In this study, we aim to compare the photodynamic inactivation (PDI) effects of two different photosensitizers (PS), Photogem® and Natural Curcumin, irradiated with light-emitted diodes (LED) at 630 and 450 nm, respectively. Background: The current antimicrobial mouthwash for oral hygiene has several drawbacks. In this context, PDI is an alternative technique to inactivate pathogenic microbes in mucosa and in periodontal tissue. Furthermore, there are numerous infectious diseases that may affect the oral cavity, motivating the use of PDI in dentistry. Methods: The volunteers (n = 50) were randomize separated into five experimental groups (n = 5) for each PS: water control, PS control, light control, and two PS concentrations (25 and 100 mg/L). Each patient underwent mouthwash solution containing the PS before illumination procedure that was performed with an LED device. For microbial decontamination evaluation, the saliva was collected three times: before (T0), immediately after (T1), and 24 h after the illumination procedure (T2). After that, the difference between the colony forming units (CFU) for each volunteer was compared. Results: The results show that regardless of PS and treatment applied, there was microbial reduction immediately after PDI, however, after 24 h only Natural Curcumin still presents a reduction. For Photogem after 24 h, the microorganism returns to the original CFU. Conclusions: Immediately after PDI, both PS have the same efficiency, nevertheless the Natural Curcumin still has an efficacy after 24 h and also is a more viable photosensitizer. In addition, the results indicate that PDI can be a promised technique used for microbial reducing for the oral cavity.en
dc.description.affiliationSchool of Dentistry of Araraquara UNESP University of Estadual Paulista
dc.description.affiliationSão Carlos Institute of Physics University of São Paulo, PO Box 369
dc.description.affiliationBiomedical Engineer Research Center CEB Camilo Castelo Branco University
dc.description.affiliationUnespSchool of Dentistry of Araraquara UNESP University of Estadual Paulista
dc.format.extent105-110
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1089/pho.2016.4114
dc.identifier.citationPhotomedicine and Laser Surgery, v. 35, n. 2, p. 105-110, 2017.
dc.identifier.doi10.1089/pho.2016.4114
dc.identifier.file2-s2.0-85011020043.pdf
dc.identifier.issn1549-5418
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85011020043
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/169412
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofPhotomedicine and Laser Surgery
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,443
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso abertopt
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectclinical
dc.subjectcurcuminoids
dc.subjecthematoporphyrin
dc.subjectin vivo
dc.subjectphotodynamic inactivation
dc.titleClinical Comparison of Two Photosensitizers for Oral Cavity Decontaminationen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araraquarapt

Arquivos

Pacote Original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
2-s2.0-85011020043.pdf
Tamanho:
336.07 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descrição: