Logo do repositório
 

Topical gentamicin for the prevention of tunneled hemodialysis catheter-related infections: a randomized double-blind study

dc.contributor.authorCaetano, Camille Pereira [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCassimiro, Vanessa Piacitelli [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorDionisio, Daniele Lopes [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPereira, Viviane Pollo [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, Elisabete Aparecida Crispim [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorRosa, Priscila Nunes [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorElias, Daniele Aparecida [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPonce, Daniela [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-29T13:12:29Z
dc.date.available2023-07-29T13:12:29Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-01
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Infection is the second leading cause of death in dialysis patients, with catheter-related bloodstream infection being the most serious. Exit Site Infection and Tunnel Infection are also related to the catheter. Objective: To compare the infection rates achieved with the application of either topical gentamicin or placebo to the exit-site of tunneled catheters filled with locking solution in chronic hemodialysis patients. Methods: This randomized double-blind clinical trial compared the application of 0.1% gentamicin versus placebo to the exit site of tunneled hemodialysis catheters filled with a prophylactic locking solution. A total of 91 patients were randomly allocated to 2 groups: placebo or 0.1% gentamicin. Results: Mean patient age was 60.4 (+ 15.3) years, with predominance of males (60.4%). The main cause of chronic kidney disease was diabetes (40.7%). The rates of exit site infection (placebo = 30% vs. gentamicin = 34.1%, p = 0.821), and bloodstream infection (placebo = 22% vs. gentamicin = 17.1%, p = 0.60), as well as both exit site infection and bloodstream infection incidence density per 1000 catheter-days (p = 1) did not differ between groups. The infection-free curve was also similar in both groups. Conclusion: The application of topical 0.1% gentamicin to the exit site of tunneled catheters filled with lock solution did not reduce infectious complications when compared to topical placebo in patients on chronic hemodialysis. Graphical abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.].en
dc.description.affiliationUNESP FMB: Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho Faculdade de Medicina Campus de Botucatu, São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationUnespUNESP FMB: Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho Faculdade de Medicina Campus de Botucatu, São Paulo
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40620-023-01615-x
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Nephrology.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s40620-023-01615-x
dc.identifier.issn1724-6059
dc.identifier.issn1121-8428
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85157984344
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/247304
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Nephrology
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCatheter-related infections
dc.subjectCentral venous catheters
dc.subjectHemodialysis
dc.subjectTunneled catheter
dc.titleTopical gentamicin for the prevention of tunneled hemodialysis catheter-related infections: a randomized double-blind studyen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Medicina, Botucatupt

Arquivos