Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Can innovative methods of polymerization improve the physical-mechanical behavior of acrylic resins?

dc.contributor.authordos Santos, Daniela Micheline [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPenitente, Paulo Augusto [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorda Silva, Emily Vivianne Freitas [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCommar, Betina Chiarelo [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBento Laurindo Júnior, Murilo César [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorde Souza Batista, Victor Eduardo
dc.contributor.authorGoiato, Marcelo Coelho [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionPresidente Prudente
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-12T01:50:20Z
dc.date.available2020-12-12T01:50:20Z
dc.date.issued2020-03-01
dc.description.abstractAcrylic-based resin is the material of choice for the fabrication of definitive and provisional prostheses. In order to achieve clinical success, it is important to know the most suitable polymerization process for this material. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different polymerization methods on several physical and mechanical properties, before and after thermocycling, of a heat-activated acrylic resin (HAAR). In addition, the degree of conversion (DC) was evaluated for all polymerization methods. Ninety HAAR samples were divided into three groups: conventional polymerization (CP), dry-heat polymerization (DHP), and digital pneumatic polymerization (DPP). Color, microhardness (n = 10), and flexural strength tests (n = 20) were performed, before and after 2000 cycles of thermocycling. The analysis of the DC was performed by using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (n = 4). Color alteration and DC data were submitted to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Microhardness and flexural strength data were submitted to two-way repeated measures ANOVA. All results were submitted to the Tukey test (α = .05). The color alteration was statistically lower in the DHP group. The DPP group exhibited higher initial microhardness with a statistically significant difference from other the groups. There was no statistical difference between the groups in regards to flexural strength. The CP and DPP groups had higher DC results. The proposed polymerization methods had divergent results for the different properties analyzed. However, these results were similar to those of conventional polymerization, which is a viable and adequate alternative.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Aracatuba Dental School Sao Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationPresidente Prudente Dental School University of Western Sao Paulo (UNOESTE) Presidente Prudente
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Aracatuba Dental School Sao Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2019.100835
dc.identifier.citationMaterials Today Communications, v. 22.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.mtcomm.2019.100835
dc.identifier.issn2352-4928
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85076677133
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/199827
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofMaterials Today Communications
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAcrylic resins
dc.subjectColor
dc.subjectFlexural strength
dc.subjectHardness
dc.subjectInterim dental prostheses
dc.subjectPolymerization
dc.subjectPolymethyl methacrylate
dc.titleCan innovative methods of polymerization improve the physical-mechanical behavior of acrylic resins?en
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isDepartmentOfPublication5f53b343-da2a-4737-96ec-6e2389a6d704
relation.isDepartmentOfPublication.latestForDiscovery5f53b343-da2a-4737-96ec-6e2389a6d704
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication8b3335a4-1163-438a-a0e2-921a46e0380d
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery8b3335a4-1163-438a-a0e2-921a46e0380d
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araçatubapt
unesp.departmentMateriais odontológicos e Prótese - FOApt

Arquivos