Logo do repositório

Effectiveness of reciproc and MTwo for removing filling material during root canal retreatment using a digital radiograph system

dc.contributor.authorde Oliveira, Daniel Pinto
dc.contributor.authorPeixoto, Tayná Ribeiro Oliveira
dc.contributor.authorBueno, Clovis Stephano Pereira
dc.contributor.authorGonçalves, Marcelo [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionFederal University of Alagoas
dc.contributor.institutionCesmac Universitary Center
dc.contributor.institutionBrazilian Association of Dentistry
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-06T17:04:10Z
dc.date.available2019-10-06T17:04:10Z
dc.date.issued2018-01-01
dc.description.abstractObjective: To compare the efficacy of Reciproc (reciprocating) and MTwo (rotary) in the filling material removal during endodontic retreatment. Methods: Thirty simulated root canals (plastic blocks) were prepared and filled. The blocks were divided into 3 groups according to the filling removal techniques: Group I-hand files and Gates Glidden burs; Group II-Rotary technique with second series files of Mtwo system; Group III-Reciprocating technique with instrument R40 Reciproc. The blocks were radiographed, the total area of the root canal and the amount of remaining plug material was calculated. The total time required to complete the procedure was recorded and the instruments were evaluated for fracture or deformation. Results: The mean percentage of obturator material remaining in the root canal wall was 15.36% in Group I, 11.56% in Group II and 10.36% in Group III. There was a statistical difference between Group 1 and the other Groups. There was no statistical difference between Groups II and III. Removal of filling material was significantly faster in Group III (437.433 s), followed by Group II (616.535 s) and Group I (1587.651 s). Conclusion: The best results of filling material removal were obtained by groups II and III without statistical difference between them. The reciprocating technique was the fastest among the techniques tested, followed by the rotary technique and manual technique files.en
dc.description.affiliationFaculty of Dentistry Federal University of Alagoas, Av. Lourival Melo Mota, S/N, Tabuleiro do Martins
dc.description.affiliationFaculty of Dentistry Cesmac Universitary Center
dc.description.affiliationFaculdade Sao Leopoldo Mandic Brazilian Association of Dentistry
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery UNESP-Universidade Estadual Paulista
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery UNESP-Universidade Estadual Paulista
dc.format.extent1021-1028
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874210601812011021
dc.identifier.citationOpen Dentistry Journal, v. 12, n. 1, p. 1021-1028, 2018.
dc.identifier.doi10.2174/1874210601812011021
dc.identifier.issn1874-2106
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85062320709
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/190156
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofOpen Dentistry Journal
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso abertopt
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectNickel-titanium instruments
dc.subjectReciproc files
dc.subjectReciprocating motion
dc.subjectRetreatment
dc.subjectRoot canal filling materials
dc.subjectRotary instruments
dc.titleEffectiveness of reciproc and MTwo for removing filling material during root canal retreatment using a digital radiograph systemen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationca4c0298-cd82-48ee-a9c8-c97704bac2b0
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryca4c0298-cd82-48ee-a9c8-c97704bac2b0
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araraquarapt
unesp.departmentDiagnóstico e Cirurgia - FOARpt

Arquivos