Logo do repositório

Validation methods to study the consistency and quality of radio occultation electron density profiles: application to COSMIC

dc.contributor.authorJerez, Gabriel O. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorHernández-Pajares, Manuel
dc.contributor.authorAlves, Daniele B.M. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMonico, João F.G. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC)
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T20:05:48Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-01
dc.description.abstractRadio occultation (RO) is a relevant source of information from the atmosphere. Besides providing global coverage, due to the geometry of the data acquisition, RO provides measurements that can help to suppress gaps from other techniques. In this sense, RO data assimilation has potential to improve atmospheric products such as ionospheric models and numerical weather prediction. Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere and Climate (COSMIC) (2006-2020) has been one of the main RO missions, with significant number of atmospheric profiles available, especially considering the ionosphere. The ionosphere is of special relevance because it can influence the accuracy of global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) and related applications. This way, the assessment and filtering of RO data is crucial in order to identify profiles with questionable information. Many investigations have been developed aiming to provide methods of validation for RO profiles, however, no clear methodology for filtering the RO data can be easily found. In this context, in this work, seven RO filtering methods are applied including manual filtering of noisy data and discrepancies considering the first principles-based Chapman model in a normal distribution. The set of strategies using the normal distribution criteria leads to large rates of profiles exclusion (close to 90 % in some scenarios), while in most of the cases the foF2 differences do not show improvement. On the other hand, the strategy with manual filtering, in general, excludes 35 % of the profiles, leading to gain of about 7 % in the foF2 error.en
dc.description.affiliationSao Paulo State University (UNESP) Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC)
dc.description.affiliationUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC)
dc.description.affiliationSao Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationUnespSao Paulo State University (UNESP) Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC)
dc.description.affiliationUnespSao Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipInstitut National de Prévention et d'Éducation pour la Santé
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity Corporation for Atmospheric Research
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2021/05285-0
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2022/00276-5
dc.format.extent3307-3315
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.33012/2023.19184
dc.identifier.citationProceedings of the 36th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation, ION GNSS+ 2023, p. 3307-3315.
dc.identifier.doi10.33012/2023.19184
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85184565312
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/306276
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofProceedings of the 36th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation, ION GNSS+ 2023
dc.sourceScopus
dc.titleValidation methods to study the consistency and quality of radio occultation electron density profiles: application to COSMICen
dc.typeTrabalho apresentado em eventopt
dspace.entity.typePublication

Arquivos

Coleções