Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Comparative Evaluation of a Newly Developed Trunk-Based Tree Detection/Localization Strategy on Leaf-Off LiDAR Point Clouds with Varying Characteristics

dc.contributor.authorZhou, Tian
dc.contributor.authordos Santos, Renato César [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Jidong
dc.contributor.authorLin, Yi-Chun
dc.contributor.authorFei, William Changhao
dc.contributor.authorFei, Songlin
dc.contributor.authorHabib, Ayman
dc.contributor.institutionPurdue University
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-01T21:11:22Z
dc.date.available2023-03-01T21:11:22Z
dc.date.issued2022-08-01
dc.description.abstractLiDAR data acquired by various platforms provide unprecedented data for forest inventory and management. Among its applications, individual tree detection and segmentation are critical and prerequisite steps for deriving forest structural metrics, especially at the stand level. Although there are various tree detection and localization approaches, a comparative analysis of their performance on LiDAR data with different characteristics remains to be explored. In this study, a new trunk-based tree detection and localization approach (namely, height-difference-based) is proposed and compared to two state-of-the-art strategies—DBSCAN-based and height/density-based approaches. Leaf-off LiDAR data from two unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and Geiger mode system with different point densities, geometric accuracies, and environmental complexities were used to evaluate the performance of these approaches in a forest plantation. The results from the UAV datasets suggest that DBSCAN-based and height/density-based approaches perform well in tree detection (F1 score > 0.99) and localization (with an accuracy of 0.1 m for point clouds with high geometric accuracy) after fine-tuning the model thresholds; however, the processing time of the latter is much shorter. Even though our new height-difference-based approach introduces more false positives, it obtains a high tree detection rate from UAV datasets without fine-tuning model thresholds. However, due to the limitations of the algorithm, the tree localization accuracy is worse than that of the other two approaches. On the other hand, the results from the Geiger mode dataset with low point density show that the performance of all approaches dramatically deteriorates. Among them, the proposed height-difference-based approach results in the greatest number of true positives and highest F1 score, making it the most suitable approach for low-density point clouds without the need for parameter/threshold fine-tuning.en
dc.description.affiliationLyles School of Civil Engineering Purdue University
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Cartography and Graduate Program on Cartographic Sciences (PPGCC) São Paulo State University, SP
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Forestry and Natural Resources Purdue University
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Cartography and Graduate Program on Cartographic Sciences (PPGCC) São Paulo State University, SP
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs14153738
dc.identifier.citationRemote Sensing, v. 14, n. 15, 2022.
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/rs14153738
dc.identifier.issn2072-4292
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85137087314
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/241582
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofRemote Sensing
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectforest inventory
dc.subjectGeiger-mode
dc.subjectLiDAR
dc.subjecttree detection and localization
dc.subjectunmanned aerial vehicles (UAV)
dc.titleComparative Evaluation of a Newly Developed Trunk-Based Tree Detection/Localization Strategy on Leaf-Off LiDAR Point Clouds with Varying Characteristicsen
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-6423-4090[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-0263-312X[2]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-3564-372X[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-2772-0166[6]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-6498-5951[7]
unesp.departmentCartografia - FCTpt

Arquivos