Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
In vitro effect of calcium-containing prescription-strength fluoride toothpastes on bovine enamel erosion under hyposalivation-simulating conditions

dc.contributor.authorScaramucci, Taís
dc.contributor.authorBorges, Alessandra B. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorLippert, Frank
dc.contributor.authorZero, Domenick T.
dc.contributor.authorHara, Anderson T.
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Dentistry
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-28T19:00:58Z
dc.date.available2022-04-28T19:00:58Z
dc.date.issued2015-02-01
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To evaluate the ability of calcium-containing prescription-strength fluoride (F) toothpastes in preventing enamel erosion under low salivary flow simulating conditions. Methods: Enamel and dentin bovine specimens were assigned to the following groups: A - placebo; B - 1,100 ppm F/NaF (Aquafresh Advanced); C - 5,000 ppm F/NaF (Prevident 5000 Booster); D - 5000 ppm F/NaF+calcium sodium phosphosilicate (Topex Renew); and E - 5,000 ppm F/NaF+tri-calcium phosphate (Clinpro 5000). Specimens were positioned in custom-made devices, creating a sealed chamber on the surface, connected to peristaltic pumps. Citric acid was injected into the chamber for 2 minutes, followed by artificial saliva (0.05 ml/minute), for 60 minutes, 4×/day, for 3 days. Aquafresh was also tested under normal salivary flow (0.5 ml/minute), as reference (Group F). Specimens were exposed to the toothpastes for 2 minutes, 2×/day. After cycling, surface loss (SL) and concentration of loosely- and firmly-bound F were determined. Data were analyzed by ANOVA. Results: Group A (placebo) presented highest surface loss (SL), while Group F had the lowest, for both substrates. For enamel, none of the dentifrices differed from Group B or among each other. For dentin, none of the dentifrices differed from Group B, but Group E showed greater protection than Group C. Group E presented the highest F concentrations for both substrates, only matched by Group D for firmly-bound fluoride on enamel. All fluoridated dentifrices tested reduced SL, with no additional benefit from higher F concentrations. Some formulations, especially Clinpro 5000, increased F availability on the dental substrates, but no further erosion protection was observed.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Restorative Dentistry School of Dentistry University of São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Restorative Dentistry Paulista State Univ.
dc.description.affiliationOral Health Research Institute Indiana University School of Dentistry
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Preventive and Community Dentistry Indiana University School of Dentistry, 415 N. Lansing Street
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Restorative Dentistry Paulista State Univ.
dc.description.sponsorshipIndiana University
dc.format.extent18-22
dc.identifier.citationAmerican Journal of Dentistry, v. 28, n. 1, p. 18-22, 2015.
dc.identifier.issn0894-8275
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84926368150
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/220339
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal of Dentistry
dc.sourceScopus
dc.titleIn vitro effect of calcium-containing prescription-strength fluoride toothpastes on bovine enamel erosion under hyposalivation-simulating conditionsen
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication

Arquivos

Coleções