Logotipo do repositório

Mechanical Chiseling Versus Root Bio-Tillage on Soil Physical Quality and Soybean Yield in a Long-Term No-Till System

dc.contributor.authorda Silva, Gustavo Ferreira
dc.contributor.authorLuperini, Bruno Cesar Ottoboni [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorde Queiroz Barcelos, Jéssica Pigatto
dc.contributor.authorPutti, Fernando Ferrari [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMooney, Sacha J.
dc.contributor.authorCalonego, Juliano Carlos [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)pt
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-10T18:36:01Z
dc.date.issued2025-05-21
dc.description.abstractOccasional mechanical intervention can help alleviate compaction symptoms in no-till systems, but its effects compared to well-established crop rotation systems are uncertain. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of mechanical and biological chiseling of the soil (via millet and sunn hemp cover crops) on soil physical properties, root development, and soybean yield in a long-term experiment. The treatments consisted of crops rotations used in the spring harvest: (I) triticale (autumn–winter), millet (spring), and soybean (summer); (II) triticale (autumn–winter), sunn hemp (spring), and soybean (summer); and (III) triticale (autumn–winter), fallow/soil chiseling (spring), and soybean (summer). Mechanical chiseling reduced bulk density and penetration resistance in the upper 0.10 m layer by 6% and 37%, respectively. However, its effects did not extend below this depth. Conversely, millet and sunn hemp maintained higher penetration resistance in surface layers but reduced resistance in deeper layers (0.20–0.40 m) by up to 27% compared to chiseling. These cover crops also improved root growth (up to 71% higher root dry mass), soil microporosity, and total porosity. Notably, sunn hemp enhanced water infiltration (151 mm accumulated) and basic infiltration rate (180 cm h−1), outperforming chiseling by 30% and 85%, respectively. Soybean yield was highest under sunn hemp, with an 18% increase over chiseling. Thus, growing millet and sunn hemp in a long-term production system can improve the soil’s physical properties, ensuring better infiltration, storage, and availability of water in the soil for plants.
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Biotechnology and Plant and Animal Production, Center of Agricultural Sciences, Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), Araras 13604-900, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Rural Engineering and Socioeconomics, School of Agriculture, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu 18610-034, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Agronomy, São Paulo Western University (UNOESTE), Presidente Prudente 19067-175, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Biosystems Engineering, School of Sciences and Engineering, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Tupã 17602-496, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationSchool of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough LE12 5RD, UK
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Crop Science, School of Agriculture, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu 18610-034, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Rural Engineering and Socioeconomics, School of Agriculture, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu 18610-034, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Biosystems Engineering, School of Sciences and Engineering, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Tupã 17602-496, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Crop Science, School of Agriculture, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu 18610-034, Brazil
dc.identifierhttps://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1188937849
dc.identifier.dimensionspub.1188937849
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/agronomy15051249
dc.identifier.issn2073-4395
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-5788-8635
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-9733-5875
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-2165-0606
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-0555-9271
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-9314-8113
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-8950-3231
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/329322
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.relation.ispartofAgronomy; n. 5; v. 15; p. 1249
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso abertopt
dc.rights.sourceRightsoa_all
dc.rights.sourceRightsgold
dc.sourceDimensions
dc.titleMechanical Chiseling Versus Root Bio-Tillage on Soil Physical Quality and Soybean Yield in a Long-Term No-Till System
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationed8e45ed-21f1-4733-b776-6c9e8c3a0da8
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationef1a6328-7152-4981-9835-5e79155d5511
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryed8e45ed-21f1-4733-b776-6c9e8c3a0da8
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas, Botucatupt
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Ciências e Engenharia, Tupãpt

Arquivos

Pacote original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
agronomy-15-01249.pdf
Tamanho:
2,25 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format