Logo do repositório

Pooled prevalence of Escherichia coli phenotypic and genotypic antimicrobial resistance profiles in poultry: systematic review and meta-analysis

dc.contributor.authorSousa, Débora Luíse Canuto de
dc.contributor.authorLimeira, Clécio Henrique
dc.contributor.authorCasella, Tiago [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorAraújo, Hosaneide Gomes de
dc.contributor.authorAquino, Vitória Viviane Ferreira de
dc.contributor.authorNeto, Domingos Andrade
dc.contributor.authorSobrinho, José Diniz de Souto
dc.contributor.authorAzevedo, Sérgio Santos de
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Carolina de Sousa Américo Batista
dc.contributor.institutionPost-Graduate Program in Animal Science and Health
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T20:02:08Z
dc.date.issued2025-03-01
dc.description.abstractEscherichia coli is a zoonotic bacterium, and its resistance to antimicrobials has become an increasing problem in global health. This study aimed to determine the phenotypic and genotypic pooled prevalence of E. coli with antimicrobial resistance profiles in poultry through systematic review and meta-analysis. Articles available in scientific databases from years 2017 to 2024 were evaluated. Overall, 18 studies were included in the meta-analysis and prevalence of E. coli resistance in poultry. Estimated by the random effects model, the pooled prevalence of resistance to at least one antibiotic in E. coli isolated from poultry samples was 76.96% (95% CI = 48.74–92.15%), and multidrug-resistant isolates of 89.44% (95% CI = 75.51–95.88%). The highest prevalence was to nalidixic acid (86.67%; 95% CI = 59.32–96.67%), followed by isolates resistant to tetracycline (79.33%; 95% CI = 62.86–89.69%). Tetracycline resistance genes had the highest prevalence, with 29.78% of isolates (498/1076) positive for at least one of the three genes (tetA, tetB and/or tetC). The levels of phenotypic and genotypic prevalence of E. coli in poultry can provide a scientific basis for the control of antibiotic-resistant strains and contribute to the competent authorities to guide the management interventions that best suit the different geographical regions.en
dc.description.affiliationFederal University of Campina Grande Post-Graduate Program in Animal Science and Health, PB
dc.description.affiliationPaulista State University “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” Base Hospital - Funfarme, SP
dc.description.affiliationUnespPaulista State University “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” Base Hospital - Funfarme, SP
dc.format.extent693-707
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42770-024-01560-2
dc.identifier.citationBrazilian Journal of Microbiology, v. 56, n. 1, p. 693-707, 2025.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s42770-024-01560-2
dc.identifier.issn1678-4405
dc.identifier.issn1517-8382
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-86000425087
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/305130
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofBrazilian Journal of Microbiology
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAntibiotics
dc.subjectBacterial resistance
dc.subjectChickens
dc.subjectGenes
dc.subjectHens
dc.titlePooled prevalence of Escherichia coli phenotypic and genotypic antimicrobial resistance profiles in poultry: systematic review and meta-analysisen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-1777-7348[8]

Arquivos

Coleções