Publicação: Susceptibility of contemporary single-bottle self-etch dentine adhesives to intrinsic water permeation
dc.contributor.author | Pucci, Cesar R. [UNESP] | |
dc.contributor.author | Gu, Li-Sha | |
dc.contributor.author | Zeng, Chang | |
dc.contributor.author | Gou, Ya-Ping | |
dc.contributor.author | Tay, Franklin R. | |
dc.contributor.author | Niu, Li-Na | |
dc.contributor.institution | Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) | |
dc.contributor.institution | Sun Yat-sen University | |
dc.contributor.institution | Huazhong University of Science and Technology | |
dc.contributor.institution | Sichuan University | |
dc.contributor.institution | Augusta University | |
dc.contributor.institution | Fourth Military Medical University | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-12-11T16:49:00Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-12-11T16:49:00Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017-11-01 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives To evaluate the effect of intrinsic water permeation on the microtensile bond strengths of different adhesive systems to dentine and the quality of resin-dentine interfaces. Methods Ninety-six non-carious human third molars were divided into 4 groups: Clearfil S3 Bond Plus (CSBP; Kuraray); Clearfil S3 Bond (C3S; Kuraray); iBond Self-Etch (IB; Heraeus-Kulzer) and Prime&Bond NT (PB, control etch-and-rinse adhesive, Dentply-Sirona). For each adhesive, specimens from one subgroup (N = 10) were bonded using zero pulpal pressure, while specimens from the other subgroup (N = 10) were bonded using 15 cm water pressure (PP). Each bonded tooth was sectioned into 1 × 1 mm sticks and stressed to failure. Data were analysed using two-way ANOVA and Holm-Sidak pairwise comparisons to examine the effects of “adhesive”, “pulpal pressure” and their interaction on bond strength (α = 0.05). Representative fractured sticks were examined by SEM. The remaining tooth slabs in each subgroup were used for TEM and CLSM. Results Microtensile bond strengths (mean ± SD; in MPa) were: 33.4 ± 6.9 (CSBP), 33.2 ± 4.7 (CSBP-PP), 35.0 ± 8.6 (C3S), 25.5 ± 7.3 (C3S-PP), 18.4 ± 4.0 (IB), 16.5 ± 6.9 (IB-PP), 28.2 ± 5.5 (PB), 20.5 ± 7.2 (PB-PP). “Adhesive-type” (P < 0.001), “pulpal-pressure” (P < 0.001) and their interactions (P < 0.001) significantly affected bond strength results. No difference between no-PP and PP subgroups was found for CSBP and IB (P > 0.05). Water droplets were identified along the resin-dentine interface for IB, IB-PP and C3S-PP. Conclusion IB exhibits water sensitivity when bonding is performed with/without pulpal pressure. C3S exhibits water sensitivity when bonding is performed with pulpal pressure. CSBP does not exhibit water sensitivity when bonding is performed with/without pulpal pressure. Clinical significance: Intrinsic water permeation during bonding procedures significantly affects bond strength results and the resin-dentine interface of contemporary single-bottle self-etch dentine adhesive systems. | en |
dc.description.affiliation | Department of Restorative Dentistry Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University UNESP | |
dc.description.affiliation | Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics Guanghua School of Stomatology & Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology Sun Yat-sen University | |
dc.description.affiliation | Department of Stomatology Tongji Hospital Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of Science and Technology | |
dc.description.affiliation | State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases West China Hospital of Stomatology Sichuan University | |
dc.description.affiliation | Department of Endodontics The Dental College of Georgia Augusta University | |
dc.description.affiliation | State Key Laboratory of Military Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases Department of Prosthodontics School of Stomatology Fourth Military Medical University | |
dc.description.affiliationUnesp | Department of Restorative Dentistry Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University UNESP | |
dc.format.extent | 52-61 | |
dc.identifier | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.08.010 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Dentistry, v. 66, p. 52-61. | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.08.010 | |
dc.identifier.file | 2-s2.0-85028462286.pdf | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0300-5712 | |
dc.identifier.lattes | 1754020652874850 | |
dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0003-4830-0400 | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85028462286 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/170074 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Dentistry | |
dc.relation.ispartofsjr | 1,919 | |
dc.rights.accessRights | Acesso aberto | |
dc.source | Scopus | |
dc.subject | Bond strength | |
dc.subject | Degradation | |
dc.subject | Dentine bonding agents | |
dc.subject | Dentine permeability | |
dc.subject | Hybrid layer | |
dc.subject | Pulpal pressure | |
dc.title | Susceptibility of contemporary single-bottle self-etch dentine adhesives to intrinsic water permeation | en |
dc.type | Artigo | |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
unesp.author.lattes | 1754020652874850[1] | |
unesp.author.orcid | 0000-0003-4830-0400[1] |
Arquivos
Pacote Original
1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
- Nome:
- 2-s2.0-85028462286.pdf
- Tamanho:
- 9.94 MB
- Formato:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Descrição: