Logo do repositório

Greenhouse gas emission estimate in sugarcane irrigation in Brazil: Is it possible to reduce it, and still increase crop yield?

dc.contributor.authorCardozo, Nilceu Piffer
dc.contributor.authorBordonal, Ricardo De Oliveira [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorLa Scala, Newton [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionSugarcane Research Center
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T16:58:59Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T16:58:59Z
dc.date.issued2016-01-01
dc.description.abstractIrrigation increases sugarcane yield, especially in areas under restricted rainfall conditions. However, few studies have been carried out on the environmental impacts of this activity, mainly regarding greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Therefore, the aim of this study was to estimate the environmental impacts of sugarcane irrigation, contemplating GHG emissions at different production scenarios. For that, biomass production was simulated under rainfed conditions and different irrigation systems, comparing six Brazilian regions (Ribeirão Preto - SP; Araçatuba - SP; Paracatu - MG; Itumbiara - GO; Paranaíba - MS; and Petrolina - PE). After gathered, GHG emission estimates of each scenario were confronted with sugarcane production data. The results were expressed in carbon (C) footprint (kg CO2eq t-1). For all evaluated regions, irrigation intensifies and encumbers environmentally the agricultural practices by increasing GHG emissions (∼7447.0 kg CO2eq ha-1 yr-1) compared with rainfed condition (∼2154.6 kg CO2eq ha-1 yr-1). Irrigation systems require a large amount of electric power, diesel and other inputs such as synthetic nitrogen fertilizers. Surprisingly, this situation can change substantially if C footprint is considered. We observed that irrigated areas had a decrease C footprint of up to 59% (33.0 kg CO2eq t-1) against rainfed ones, as observed in Petrolina scenario. In other regions, C footprint reductions ranged from 23% (7.1 kg CO2eq t-1) in Ribeirão Preto to 37% (13.9 kg CO2eq t-1) in Paracatu. Thus, irrigated agriculture impact could be explored in terms of C footprint, which depends on regional biomass production as well as irrigation system efficiency towards a better water use.en
dc.description.affiliationSugarcane Research Center
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Exact Sciences College of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences São Paulo State University (FCAV/UNESP), Via de Acesso Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane s/n
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Exact Sciences College of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences São Paulo State University (FCAV/UNESP), Via de Acesso Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane s/n
dc.format.extent3988-3997
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.040
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Cleaner Production, v. 112, p. 3988-3997.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.040
dc.identifier.file2-s2.0-84945559211.pdf
dc.identifier.issn0959-6526
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84945559211
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/172164
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Cleaner Production
dc.relation.ispartofsjr1,467
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCarbon footprint
dc.subjectClimate change
dc.subjectGreenhouse gas inventory
dc.subjectModeling
dc.subjectSaccharum officinarum
dc.subjectSustainable production
dc.titleGreenhouse gas emission estimate in sugarcane irrigation in Brazil: Is it possible to reduce it, and still increase crop yield?en
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.departmentCiências Exatas - FCAVpt

Arquivos

Pacote original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
2-s2.0-84945559211.pdf
Tamanho:
1.21 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descrição: