Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Bond strength between acrylic resin and maxillofacial silicone

dc.contributor.authorHaddad, Marcela Filié [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGoiato, Marcelo Coelho [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authordos Santos, Daniela Micheline [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCrepaldi, Nádia de Marchi [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPesqueira, Aldiéris Alves [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBannwart, Lisiane Cristina [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-29T06:48:18Z
dc.date.available2022-04-29T06:48:18Z
dc.date.issued2012-01-01
dc.description.abstractThe development of implant dentistry improved the possibilities of rehabilitation with maxillofacial prosthesis. However, clinically it is difficult to bond the silicone to the attachment system. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of an adhesive system on the bond strength between acrylic resin and facial silicone. Material and Methods: A total of 120 samples were fabricated with auto-polymerized acrylic resin and MDX 4-4210 facial silicone. Both materials were bonded through mechanical retentions and/or application of primers (DC 1205 primer and Sofreliner primer S) and adhesive (Silastic Medical Adhesive Type A) or not (control group). Samples were divided into 12 groups according to the method used to attach the silicone to the acrylic resin. All samples were subjected to a T-peel test in a universal testing machine. Failures were classified as adhesive, cohesive or mixed. The data were evaluated by the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Tukey's HSD test (α=.05). Results: The highest bond strength values (5.95 N/mm; 3.07 N/mm; 4.75 N/mm) were recorded for the samples that received a Sofreliner primer application. These values were significantly higher when the samples had no scratches and did not receive the application of Silastic Medical Adhesive Type A. Conclusions: The most common type of failure was adhesive. The use of Sofreliner primer increased the bond strength between the auto-polymerized acrylic resin and the Silastic MDX 4-4210 facial silicone.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araçatuba Dental School Univ Estadual Paulista-UNESP, Rua José Bonifácio, n.1193, Vila Mendonça-16.015-050-Araçatuba-SP
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araçatuba Dental School Univ Estadual Paulista-UNESP, Rua José Bonifácio, n.1193, Vila Mendonça-16.015-050-Araçatuba-SP
dc.format.extent649-654
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572012000600010
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Applied Oral Science, v. 20, n. 6, p. 649-654, 2012.
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/S1678-77572012000600010
dc.identifier.issn1678-7765
dc.identifier.issn1678-7757
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84872776982
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/227109
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Applied Oral Science
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAcrylic resins
dc.subjectDental implantation
dc.subjectPolymethyl methacrylate
dc.subjectSilicone elastomers
dc.titleBond strength between acrylic resin and maxillofacial siliconeen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isDepartmentOfPublication5f53b343-da2a-4737-96ec-6e2389a6d704
relation.isDepartmentOfPublication.latestForDiscovery5f53b343-da2a-4737-96ec-6e2389a6d704
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication8b3335a4-1163-438a-a0e2-921a46e0380d
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery8b3335a4-1163-438a-a0e2-921a46e0380d
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araçatubapt
unesp.departmentMateriais odontológicos e Prótese - FOApt

Arquivos