Logo do repositório

Effectiveness of the 5A Counseling Model-Based Interventions on Physical Activity Indicators in Adults: A Systematic Review

dc.contributor.authorGuerra, Paulo Henrique
dc.contributor.authorSposito, Letícia Aparecida Calderão [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorda Costa, Filipe Ferreira
dc.contributor.authorFermino, Rogério César
dc.contributor.authorPapini, Camila Bosquiero
dc.contributor.authorRech, Cassiano Ricardo
dc.contributor.institutionFederal University of Fronteira Sul
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionFederal University of Paraíba
dc.contributor.institutionFederal University of Technology—Paraná
dc.contributor.institutionFederal University of Triângulo Mineiro
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T20:16:28Z
dc.date.issued2023-06-01
dc.description.abstractBackground: To identify and appraise the effectiveness of the 5A-counseling-model-based interventions on indicators of physical activity in adults. Methods: A systematic review was conducted from systematic searches in Embase, Lilacs, Pubmed, Scielo, Scopus, Sportdiscus and Web of Science, involving studies published from its inception until May 2022. To avoid potential losses, searches also were made in Google Scholar and in reference lists. The assessment of studies, data extraction, and synthesis were carried out independently by two researchers. Results: Four studies composed the synthesis, which involved people with an average age between 40 and 55 years, most of the samples being women. It was observed that counseling was carried out in conjunction with other strategies, such as drawing up an action plan, sending text messages, and offering educational material. Only one study showed a statistically significant difference between the intervention and control groups in the “daily number of steps” indicator. Conclusions: Based on available studies, 5A-counseling-model-based interventions did not reflect significant findings in relation to physical activity. However, given the potential of the model, future studies are recommended with a better description of the strategies, as well as a more robust methodology, to strengthen the evidence.en
dc.description.affiliationSchool of Medicine Federal University of Fronteira Sul
dc.description.affiliationPost-Graduation Program in Sciences of Motricity São Paulo State University
dc.description.affiliationAssociated Post-Graduation Program in Physical Education University of Pernambuco Federal University of Paraíba
dc.description.affiliationPostgraduate Program in Physical Education Federal University of Technology—Paraná
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Sports Sciences Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro
dc.description.affiliationPost-Graduation Program in Physical Education Federal University of Santa Catarina
dc.description.affiliationUnespPost-Graduation Program in Sciences of Motricity São Paulo State University
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bs13060476
dc.identifier.citationBehavioral Sciences, v. 13, n. 6, 2023.
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/bs13060476
dc.identifier.issn2076-328X
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85163716948
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/309741
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofBehavioral Sciences
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subject5A
dc.subjectcounseling
dc.subjectphysical activity
dc.subjectprimary health care
dc.titleEffectiveness of the 5A Counseling Model-Based Interventions on Physical Activity Indicators in Adults: A Systematic Reviewen
dc.typeResenhapt
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-4239-0716[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-9028-4179[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-1163-5576[5]

Arquivos

Coleções