Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Comparison of right-to-left shunt characteristics in cryptogenic embolic ischemic stroke and non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke

dc.contributor.authorScavasine, Valeria Cristina
dc.contributor.authorChamma, Jamileh Ferreira
dc.contributor.authorBazan, Rodrigo [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBraga, Gabriel Pereira
dc.contributor.authorLange, Marcos Christiano
dc.contributor.authorde Hiroki Flumignan Zétola, Viviane
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS)
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-29T08:36:37Z
dc.date.available2022-04-29T08:36:37Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-01
dc.description.abstractBackground: Patent foramen ovale (PFO) has been considered a potential mechanism of embolic stroke of undetermined origin. Objective: The aim of the present study was to identify the features of the right-to-left shunt (RLS) in patients with undetermined embolic ischemic stroke and compare them with those of patients with non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted with 168 patients with stroke and RLS separated into the following two groups: the undetermined embolic stroke group (UES group) and non-cardioembolic stroke group (NCES group). All patients were assessed by transcranial Doppler to evaluate the presence and quantification of microembolic signals (MES) at rest and under Valsalva maneuver. Results: Of all patients evaluated in the current study, 96 were included in the UES group and 72 in the NCES group. In the UES group, 65 patients had RLS with ≥10 MES (67.7%), which was higher than that observed in the NCES group (51.4%, p=0.038). According to the moment of the cardiac cycle, 75 patients (78.1%) in the UES group had a positive test at rest compared to 42 (58.3%) in the NCES group (p=0.007). Conclusions: The current study demonstrated that almost 70% of patients with undetermined embolic stroke and PFO presented a large RLS and more than 75% had RLS at rest. These findings suggest that the size of the shunt should be taken into account when evaluating whether PFO could be a possible mechanism underlying cryptogenic stroke.en
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Federal do Paraná Hospital de Clínicas Departamento de Neurologia, PR
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” Departamento de Neurologia, SP
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul Departamento de Neurologia, MS
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniversidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” Departamento de Neurologia, SP
dc.format.extent859-863
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0004-282X-ANP-2020-0430
dc.identifier.citationArquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, v. 79, n. 10, p. 859-863, 2021.
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/0004-282X-ANP-2020-0430
dc.identifier.issn1678-4227
dc.identifier.issn0004-282X
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85119295110
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/229906
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofArquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectDoppler
dc.subjectEmbolism
dc.subjectForamen ovale
dc.subjectIschemic stroke
dc.subjectParadoxical
dc.subjectPatent
dc.subjectStroke
dc.subjectTranscranial
dc.subjectUltrasonography
dc.titleComparison of right-to-left shunt characteristics in cryptogenic embolic ischemic stroke and non-cardioembolic ischemic strokeen
dc.titleComparação das características do shunt direita-esquerda em pacientes com AVC isquêmico criptogênio e AVC não cardioembólicopt
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-2972-0971[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-8919-2998[2]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-3872-308X[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-6798-4591[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-0405-7157[5]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-8464-9488[6]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Medicina, Botucatupt
unesp.departmentNeurologia, Psicologia e Psiquiatria - FMBpt

Arquivos