Publicação:
Student's academic efficacy or Inefficacy? an example on how to evaluate the psychometric properties of a measuring instrument and evaluate the effects of item wording

dc.contributor.authorMaroco, João
dc.contributor.authorMaroco, Ana Lúcia
dc.contributor.authorCampos, Juliana Alvares Duarte Bonini [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionInstituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada (ISPA)
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-06T16:13:44Z
dc.date.available2015-08-06T16:13:44Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.description.abstractThis study evaluated the effect of item inversion on the construct validity and reliability of psychometric scales and proposed a theoretical framework for the evaluation of the psychometric properties of data gathered with psychometric instruments. To this propose, we used the Maslach Burnout Inventory, which is the most used psychometric inventory to measure burnout in different professional context (Students, Teachers, Police, Doctors, Nurses, etc…). The version of the MBI used was the MBI-Student Survey (MBI-SS). This inventory is composed of three key dimensions: Exhaustion, Cynicism and Professional Efficacy. The two first dimensions—which have positive formulated items—are moderate to strong positive correlated, and show moderate to strong negative correlations with the 3rd dimension—which has negative formulated items. We tested the hypothesis that, in college students, formulating the 3rd dimension of burnout as Inefficacy (reverting the negatively worded items in the Efficacy dimension) improves the correlation of the 3rd dimension with the other two dimensions, improves its internal consistency, and the overall MBI-SS’ construct validity and reliability. Confirmatory factor analysis results, estimated by Maximum Likelihood, revealed adequate factorial fit for both forms of the MBI-SS (with Efficacy) vs. the MBI-SSi (with Inefficacy). Also both forms showed adequate convergent and discriminant related validity. However, reliability and convergent validity were higher for the MBI-SSi. There were also stronger (positive) correlations between the 3 factors in MBI-SSi than the ones observed in MBI-SS. Results show that positively rewording of the 3rd dimension of the MBI-SS improves its validity and reliability. We therefore propose that the 3rd dimension of the MBI-SS should be named Professional Inefficacy and its items should be positively worded.en
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Departamento de Odontologia Social, Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara, Araraquara, Rua Humaitá 1680, Centro, CEP 14801-385, SP, Brasil
dc.description.affiliationUnidade de Investigação em Psicologia e Saúde, Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada (ISPA), Lisboa, Portugal.
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Departamento de Odontologia Social, Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara, Araraquara, Rua Humaitá 1680, Centro, CEP 14801-385, SP, Brasil
dc.format.extent484-493
dc.identifierhttp://www.scirp.org/Journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=49248#.Vb-sMBtVhHw
dc.identifier.citationOpen Journal of Statistics, v. 04, n. 06, p. 484-493, 2014.
dc.identifier.doi10.4236/ojs.2014.46046
dc.identifier.issn2161-718X
dc.identifier.lattes7167211040669505
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/126021
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofOpen Journal of Statistics
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceCurrículo Lattes
dc.subjectBurnouten
dc.subjectMaslach burnout inventory—student surveyen
dc.subjectValidityen
dc.subjectReliabilityen
dc.subjectItem inversionen
dc.titleStudent's academic efficacy or Inefficacy? an example on how to evaluate the psychometric properties of a measuring instrument and evaluate the effects of item wordingen
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.lattes7167211040669505
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araraquarapt
unesp.departmentOdontologia Social - FOARpt

Arquivos