Logo do repositório

Nutritive value of fermented soybean grains for ruminants

dc.contributor.authorde Carvalho, Laura Barbosa
dc.contributor.authorda Costa, Ana Cláudia
dc.contributor.authorNeta, Bárbara de Sousa Mota
dc.contributor.authorFonseca, Alessandra Schaphauser Roseto
dc.contributor.authorVieira, Karine Padilha Nunes [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorde Abreu, Matheus Lima Corrêa
dc.contributor.authore Pedreira, Bruno Carneiro
dc.contributor.authorGalati, Rosemary Lais
dc.contributor.authorGuerra, Wanderlei Dias
dc.contributor.authorCabral, Luciano da Silva
dc.contributor.institutionFederal University of Mato Grosso
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Tennessee
dc.contributor.institutionAssociation of Soybean and Corn Producers of the State of Mato Grosso
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T19:30:40Z
dc.date.issued2023-12-01
dc.description.abstractFermented soybean grain (FSBG) is considered improper to use as a protein source in animal nutrition, since it is assumed that defects cause changes on its chemical composition and favor mycotoxins production, but chemical composition data does not support this theory and in vivo studies are missing. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of FSBG in feedlot lamb diets. For that, two types of FSBG (partially fermented and completely fermented, PFSBG and CFSBG) and one standard soybean grain (SSBG) were obtained and evaluated alone or as a component of experimental diets by in vitro and in vivo studies, where FSBG totally replaced SSBG in feedlot lamb diets, which was included in the experimental diets in 17.4% on dry matter basis as protein source. Before the studies, both soybeans were sent to a specialized laboratory where no mycotoxins were detected. As a result, lower DM and carbohydrate contents but higher crude protein, fiber, and indigestible NDF contents were measured in CFSBG than in SSBG. Furthermore, both types of FSBG showed lower digestibility in vitro dry matter (IVDMD) than SSBG when evaluated separately; however, when evaluated in experimental diets, the substitution of SSBG for FSBG did not affect IVDMD. It was also observed that FSBG also had less rumen-degradable protein than SSBG (mean 47.9 vs 86.4%). In the in vivo study, FSBG did not affect nutrient intake, apparent digestibility, or animal performance (i.e., average daily gain and carcass gain). Thus, mycotoxins-free FSBG may be an alternative to totally replace SSBG in feedlot lamb diets.en
dc.description.affiliationFederal University of Mato Grosso, Cuiabá
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State University Julio de Mesquita, Jaboticabal
dc.description.affiliationUniversity of Tennessee
dc.description.affiliationAssociation of Soybean and Corn Producers of the State of Mato Grosso, MT
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State University Julio de Mesquita, Jaboticabal
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11250-023-03813-y
dc.identifier.citationTropical Animal Health and Production, v. 55, n. 6, 2023.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11250-023-03813-y
dc.identifier.issn1573-7438
dc.identifier.issn0049-4747
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85177686088
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/303770
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofTropical Animal Health and Production
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectDigestibility
dc.subjectFermented soybean grain
dc.subjectIn vitro evaluation
dc.subjectIn vivo study
dc.subjectLamb
dc.subjectOilseeds
dc.titleNutritive value of fermented soybean grains for ruminantsen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication3d807254-e442-45e5-a80b-0f6bf3a26e48
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery3d807254-e442-45e5-a80b-0f6bf3a26e48
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-6385-4618[10]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Jaboticabalpt

Arquivos