Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Influence of illuminants and different observers on the perception of surface gloss of resin composite

dc.contributor.authorTessarin, Fernanda Bastos Pereira [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMeirelles, Laura Célia Fernandes [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorRocha, Rafael Santos [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCaneppele, Taciana Marco Ferraz [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBresciani, Eduardo [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-06T16:07:20Z
dc.date.available2019-10-06T16:07:20Z
dc.date.issued2018-01-01
dc.description.abstractObjective: To evaluate the visual perception of surface gloss of resin composite under different illuminants by different observers. Material and methods: twelve cylindrical specimens (6mm x 1mm) were fabricated using a nanofilled resin composite (Z350, A2E shade) in order to compare different observers and to determine the limit of perceptibility of surface gloss. Bovine tooth specimen with similar dimensions was obtained for the comparison of different illuminants. Polishing of resin specimens was performed resulting in 6 groups, presenting surface gloss values at 10, 25, 40, 55, 70, and 85 GU (gloss units), measured by glossmeter (NOVOCURVE). Fifteen individuals were selected: 5 lay-person, 5 undergraduate students, and 5 dental professionals. Participants observed the specimens in a light booth (Gti lightbox) under three different illuminants, and rated the possible combinations between resin specimens or with the bovine enamel specimen (85GU). Data obtained were analyzed by PROBIT non-linear regression analysis (α=0.05). Results: Differences were observed among types of illuminants (p=0.042) and ΔGU (p=0.004), with no interaction between factors (p=0.139). The fluorescent light presented lower surface gloss perceptibility values in relation to incandescent light. There was no influence by type of observers (p=0.598). The surface gloss perception limit was 17.6 GU under the presented tested conditions. Conclusion: the illuminant type influenced perception of gloss, with lower percentage of perceptibility for fluorescent light, while such perceptibility was not influence by different observers.en
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State University (Unesp) – Institute of Science and Technology São José dos Campos Department of Restorative Dentistry
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State University (Unesp) – Institute of Science and Technology São José dos Campos Department of Restorative Dentistry
dc.format.extent451-460
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.14295/bds.2018.v21i4.1648
dc.identifier.citationBrazilian Dental Science, v. 21, n. 4, p. 451-460, 2018.
dc.identifier.doi10.14295/bds.2018.v21i4.1648
dc.identifier.issn2178-6011
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85057265750
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/188415
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofBrazilian Dental Science
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectComposite resins
dc.subjectIlluminants
dc.subjectObserver variation
dc.subjectSurface gloss
dc.titleInfluence of illuminants and different observers on the perception of surface gloss of resin compositeen
dc.titleInfluência de diferentes iluminantes e observadores na percepção do brilho superficial da resina compostapt
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, São José dos Campospt
unesp.departmentOdontologia Restauradora - ICTpt

Arquivos