Adhesive Cementation of CAD/CAM Silica-based Ceramics: Effect of Adhesive Type and Long-term Aging on the Bond Strength to Composite Cement
Loading...
Files
External sources
External sources
Date
Advisor
Coadvisor
Graduate program
Undergraduate course
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Type
Article
Access right
Files
External sources
External sources
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the effect of adhesive type and long-term aging on the shear bond strength (SBS) between silica- based ceramics and composite cement (CC). Materials and Methods: Lithium-silicate (LS), feldspathic (FD) and polymer-infiltrated ceramic (PIC) blocks were sectioned (10 x 12 x 2 mm) and divided into 24 groups considering the factors: “ceramics” (LS, FD, and PIC), “adhesive” (Ctrl: without ad- hesive; 2SC: 2-step conventional; 3SC: 3-step conventional; 1SU: 1-step universal), and “aging” (non-aged or aged [A]). After the surface treatments, CC cylinders (n = 15, Ø = 2 mm; height = 2 mm) were made and half of the samples were subjected to thermocycling (10,000) and stored in water at 37°C for 18 months. The samples were submitted to SBS testing (100 kgf, 1 mm/ min) and failure analysis. Extra samples were prepared for microscopic analysis of the adhesive interface. SBS (MPa) data was analyzed by 3-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (5%). Weibull analysis was performed on the SBS data. Results: All factors and interactions were significant for SBS (p<0.05). Before aging, there was no significant difference be- tween the tested groups and the respective control groups. After aging, the LS_1SU (22.18 ± 7.74) and LS_2SC (17.32 ± 5.86) groups exhibited significantly lower SBS than did the LS_Ctrl (30.30 ± 6.11). Only the LS_1SU group showed a significant de- crease in SBS after aging vs without aging. The LS_1SU (12.20) group showed the highest Weibull modulus, which was signifi- cantly higher than LS_2SC_A (2.82) and LS_1SU_A (3.15) groups. Conclusion: No type of adhesive applied after silane benefitted the long-term adhesion of silica-based ceramics to CC in com- parison to the groups without adhesive.
Description
Keywords
adhesive, ceramics, dental materials, dentin-bonding agents, surface treatment
Language
English
Citation
Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, v. 26, p. 125-134.





