Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Nitrogen-Fertilized Systems of Maize Intercropped With Tropical Grasses for Enhanced Yields and Estimated Land Use and Meat Production

dc.contributor.authorCrusciol, Carlos A. C. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMateus, Gustavo P.
dc.contributor.authorMomesso, Letusa [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPariz, Cristiano M. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCastilhos, Andre M. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCalonego, Juliano C. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBorghi, Emerson [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCosta, Ciniro [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorFranzluebbers, Alan J.
dc.contributor.authorCantarella, Heitor
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionSao Paulo Agcy Agribusiness Technol
dc.contributor.institutionNetherlands Inst Ecol
dc.contributor.institutionARS
dc.contributor.institutionSoils & Environm Resources Ctr
dc.contributor.institutionEmpresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA)
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-25T12:25:51Z
dc.date.available2021-06-25T12:25:51Z
dc.date.issued2020-11-05
dc.description.abstractIntercropping grain with forage crops bridges the gap between agriculture and sustainability. In tropical regions, forage grasses are increasingly being adopted as winter pasture intercropped and in rotation with maize to maximize food production. However, current recommendations for nitrogen (N) fertilizer application are based on monocropped maize (Zea mays), and the best N management approach for intercropping systems remains unclear. A field experiment was carried out in three growing seasons with three intercropping systems [monoculture maize, intercropped with palisadegrass (Urochloa brizantha), and intercropped with guineagrass (Megathyrus maximus)] combined with six different split applications of N to maize (0-0, 100-0, 70-30, 50-50, 30-70, and 0-100 kg N ha(-1) at seeding-sidedressing) with four replicates. We measured dry matter (DM) and accumulated N in maize and forage grasses, as well as maize production components and yields. Additionally, land equivalent ratio, relative crowding coefficient, aggressivity of maize with forage grasses, forage crude protein (CP) concentration, estimated animal stocking rate, and estimated meat production and economic outcomes. Greatest maize yield was 8.7 Mg ha(-1) for monocropped maize. However, favorable maize yield was also obtained in intercropping systems. Although no difference was observed between intercropping systems, applying all N at sidedressing of maize negatively affected maize and forage yields and, consequently, land use and economic evaluation. For both intercropping systems, estimated meat and land use were 114 and 10% higher when N fertilizer was applied than the control (0-0 kg N ha(-1)), on average. Maize-forage grass intercropping is a viable alternative production system for improving yields and land use. In addition, estimated meat production and revenue can be enhanced with palisadegrass or guineagrass. At least half of the N fertilizer must be applied early in the growing season of maize to maximize production of the entire system.en
dc.description.affiliationSao Paulo State Univ, Dept Soil Sci, Coll Agr Sci, Botucatu, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationSao Paulo Agcy Agribusiness Technol, Agencia Paulista Tecnol Agronegocios, Dept Dev Decentralizat, Andradina, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationNetherlands Inst Ecol, Dept Microbial Ecol, NIOO KNAW, Wageningen, Netherlands
dc.description.affiliationSao Paulo State Univ, Sch Vet Med & Anim Sci, Dept Anim Nutr & Breeding, Botucatu, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationSao Paulo State Univ, Coll Agr Sci, Botucatu, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationARS, USDA, NCSU Campus, Raleigh, NC USA
dc.description.affiliationSoils & Environm Resources Ctr, Inst Agron Campinas, IAC, Campinas, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationBrazilian Agr Res Corp, Corn & Sorghum Res Ctr, EMBRAPA, Sete Lagoas, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespSao Paulo State Univ, Dept Soil Sci, Coll Agr Sci, Botucatu, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespSao Paulo State Univ, Sch Vet Med & Anim Sci, Dept Anim Nutr & Breeding, Botucatu, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespSao Paulo State Univ, Coll Agr Sci, Botucatu, SP, Brazil
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2003/09914-3
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2003/01968-7
dc.format.extent13
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.544853
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers In Sustainable Food Systems. Lausanne: Frontiers Media Sa, v. 4, 13 p., 2020.
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fsufs.2020.544853
dc.identifier.lattes9790998212635563
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1854-2927
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/209683
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000591815300001
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherFrontiers Media Sa
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers In Sustainable Food Systems
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectBrachiaria brizantha
dc.subjectMegathyrsus maximus
dc.subjectZea mays L
dc.subjecttropical agriculture
dc.subjectintercropping grasses
dc.subjectno-tillage system
dc.titleNitrogen-Fertilized Systems of Maize Intercropped With Tropical Grasses for Enhanced Yields and Estimated Land Use and Meat Productionen
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.rightsHolderFrontiers Media Sa
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.lattes9790998212635563[8]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-4712-0301[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-1854-2927[8]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Botucatupt
unesp.departmentMelhoramento e Nutrição Animal - FMVZpt

Arquivos