Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Effects of automatic mechanical peripheral stimulation on gait biomechanics in older adults with Parkinson’s disease: a randomized crossover clinical trial

dc.contributor.authorMarques, Nise Ribeiro
dc.contributor.authorKuroda, Marina Hiromi [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMoreno, Vinicius Christianini [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorZámuner, Antonio Roberto
dc.contributor.authorBarbieri, Fabio Augusto [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUSC
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionUCM
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-01T16:48:24Z
dc.date.available2022-05-01T16:48:24Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-01
dc.description.abstractBackground: Automated mechanical peripheral stimulation (AMPS) is a rehabilitation technique suggested to correct gait abnormalities on Parkinson’s disease. Although previous studies have suggested increments in functional performance and gait speed after AMPS intervention, little is known about its effect on gait biomechanics. Objective: To analyze the effect of an AMPS session on functional performance and gait biomechanics in subjects with Parkinson’s disease. Methods: Twenty-eight subjects aged 67±3 years old participated in this study. Kinematics and muscle activation were recorded during walking at a preferred gait speed before and after AMPS and sham interventions. Footswitches sensors were used to record the kinematic parameters. Electromyographic (EMG) signals of tibialis anterior (TA) and gastrocnemius lateralis (GL) were recorded. Timed up and go (TUG) test and Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) were performed to assess functional performance. Results: GL activation increased after AMPS intervention before and after heel strike (p = 0.04; p < 0.01) and before and after toe-off (p = 0.013; p = 0.038). Also, after AMPS intervention, TA activation increased after heel strike (p = 0.007); and after sham intervention, TA activation reduced before and after heel strike (p = 0.038; and p = 0.007) and before toe-off (p = 0.013). The time of TUG test was shorter after AMPS intervention (p = 0.015). Conclusion: AMPS intervention changed the EMG activation of ankle muscles during walking and functional performance. However, AMPS intervention did not change gait kinematics.en
dc.description.affiliationCenter of Healthy Science Universidade do Sagrado Coração USC, Rua Irmã Arminda, 10-50, SP
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Physical Education São Paulo State University UNESP
dc.description.affiliationLaboratorio de Investigación Clínica en Kinesiología Department of Kinesiology Universidad Católica del Maule UCM
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Physical Education São Paulo State University UNESP
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40520-022-02075-2
dc.identifier.citationAging Clinical and Experimental Research.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s40520-022-02075-2
dc.identifier.issn1720-8319
dc.identifier.issn1594-0667
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85127583354
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/234352
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofAging Clinical and Experimental Research
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBiomechanics
dc.subjectElectromyography
dc.subjectKinematics
dc.subjectPhysical therapy
dc.titleEffects of automatic mechanical peripheral stimulation on gait biomechanics in older adults with Parkinson’s disease: a randomized crossover clinical trialen
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-4977-4755[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-7480-3047[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-3678-8456[5]
unesp.departmentEducação Física - FCpt

Arquivos