Logo do repositório
 

Influence of the implant diameter with different sizes of hexagon: Analysis by 3-dimensional finite element method

dc.contributor.authorPellizzer, Eduardo Piza [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorVerri, Fellippo Ramos [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorDe Moraes, Sandra Lúcia Dantas [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorFalcón-Antenucci, Rosse Mary [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorDe Carvalho, Paulo Sérgio Perri [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorNoritomi, Pedro Yoshito
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionRenato Archer Information Technology Center
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:30:06Z
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:30:06Z
dc.date.issued2013-08-01
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate the stress distribution in implants of regular platforms and of wide diameter with different sizes of hexagon by the 3-dimensional finite element method. We used simulated 3-dimensional models with the aid of Solidworks 2006 and Rhinoceros 4.0 software for the design of the implant and abutment and the InVesalius software for the design of the bone. Each model represented a block of bone from the mandibular molar region with an implant 10 mm in length and different diameters. Model A was an implant 3.75 mm/regular hexagon, model B was an implant 5.00 mm/regular hexagon, and model C was an implant 5.00 mm/ expanded hexagon. A load of 200 N was applied in the axial, lateral, and oblique directions. At implant, applying the load (axial, lateral, and oblique), the 3 models presented stress concentration at the threads in the cervical and middle regions, and the stress was higher for model A. At the abutment, models A and B showed a similar stress distribution, concentrated at the cervical and middle third; model C showed the highest stresses. On the cortical bone, the stress was concentrated at the cervical region for the 3 models and was higher for model A. In the trabecular bone, the stresses were less intense and concentrated around the implant body, and were more intense for model A. Among the models of wide diameter (models B and C), model B (implant 5.00 mm/regular hexagon) was more favorable with regard to distribution of stresses. Model A (implant 3.75 mm/regular hexagon) showed the largest areas and the most intense stress, and model B (implant 5.00 mm/regular hexagon) showed a more favorable stress distribution. The highest stresses were observed in the application of lateral load.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araçatuba School of Dentistry São Paulo State University-UNESP
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Surgery and Integrated Clinic Araçatuba School of Dentistry São Paulo State University-UNESP
dc.description.affiliationRenato Archer Information Technology Center, São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araçatuba School of Dentistry São Paulo State University-UNESP
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Surgery and Integrated Clinic Araçatuba School of Dentistry São Paulo State University-UNESP
dc.format.extent425-431
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00103
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Oral Implantology, v. 39, n. 4, p. 425-431, 2013.
dc.identifier.doi10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00103
dc.identifier.issn0160-6972
dc.identifier.issn1548-1336
dc.identifier.lattes5581364193525500
dc.identifier.lattes1239305418355498
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84883405603
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/76170
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000323804300004
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Oral Implantology
dc.relation.ispartofjcr1.212
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,569
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restritopt
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBiomechanics
dc.subjectDental implants
dc.subjectFinite element analysis
dc.subjectcompressive strength
dc.subjectdental procedure
dc.subjectfinite element analysis
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectmethodology
dc.subjecttensile strength
dc.subjecttooth implant
dc.subjecttooth prosthesis
dc.subjectYoung modulus
dc.subjectCompressive Strength
dc.subjectDental Implants
dc.subjectDental Models
dc.subjectDental Prosthesis Design
dc.subjectDental Stress Analysis
dc.subjectElastic Modulus
dc.subjectFinite Element Analysis
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectTensile Strength
dc.titleInfluence of the implant diameter with different sizes of hexagon: Analysis by 3-dimensional finite element methoden
dc.typeArtigopt
dcterms.licensehttp://www.joionline.org/userimages/ContentEditor/1240858717108/Terms_and_Conditions_ORIM1.pdf
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication8b3335a4-1163-438a-a0e2-921a46e0380d
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery8b3335a4-1163-438a-a0e2-921a46e0380d
unesp.author.lattes5581364193525500
unesp.author.lattes1239305418355498
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araçatubapt
unesp.departmentCirurgia e Clínica Integrada - FOApt

Arquivos