Logo do repositório

Influence of depth of mesio-occlusodistal preparation and mechanical cycling on fracture resistance of restored premolars

dc.contributor.authorSábio, Silvia Sbeghen
dc.contributor.authorDe Moraes Melo Neto, Clóvis Lamartine [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMondelli, José
dc.contributor.authorAtta, Maria Teresa
dc.contributor.institutionState University of Maringá
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-06T15:37:01Z
dc.date.available2019-10-06T15:37:01Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-01
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of depth (3.0 vs 5.0 mm) of mesio-occlusodistal (MOD) cavity preparation and mechanical cycling on fracture resistance of maxillary premolars restored with resin-based composite (RBC). Seventy premolars were randomly divided into 7 groups (n = 10): NP, no cavity preparation (control); MOD3, 3.0-mm-deep MOD preparation, not restored; MOD3R, 3.0-mm-deep MOD preparation restored with RBC; MOD5, 5.0-mm-deep MOD preparation, not restored; MOD5R, 5.0-mm-deep MOD preparation restored with RBC; MOD3RC, 3.0-mm-deep MOD preparation restored with RBC and subjected to mechanical cycling; and MOD5RC, 5.0-mm-deep MOD preparation restored with RBC and subjected to mechanical cycling under the same conditions as MOD3RC. All specimens were tested using a universal testing machine, resulting in the following mean (SD) values: NP, 224.65 (35.66) kgf; MOD3, 58.92 (15.48) kgf; MOD3R, 95.58 (13.88) kgf; MOD5, 68.06 (10.12) kgf; MOD5R, 98.49 (13.16) kgf; MOD3RC, 83.68 (14.39) kgf; and MOD5RC, 54.25 (11.56) kgf. Analysis of variance and Tukey test showed no statistically significant difference among MOD3, MOD5, and MOD5RC; between MOD5 and MOD3RC; or among MOD3R, MOD5R, and MOD3RC (P > 0.05). MOD3RC had significantly greater fracture resistance than MOD5RC (P < 0.05). NP had the highest fracture resistance of all groups (P < 0.05). The results showed that the depth of the cavity preparation only influenced fracture resistance after mechanical cycling of the specimens.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dentistry State University of Maringá
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics São Paulo State University (UNESP) School of Dentistry
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Operative Dentistry Endodontics and Dental Materials Bauru School of Dentistry University of São Paulo (FOB-USP)
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics São Paulo State University (UNESP) School of Dentistry
dc.format.extentE7-E10
dc.identifier.citationGeneral Dentistry, v. 67, n. 2, p. E7-E10, 2019.
dc.identifier.issn0363-6771
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85063006446
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/187467
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofGeneral Dentistry
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectComposite resin
dc.subjectDental restoration
dc.subjectFracture resistance
dc.subjectMechanical cycling
dc.titleInfluence of depth of mesio-occlusodistal preparation and mechanical cycling on fracture resistance of restored premolarsen
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication

Arquivos

Coleções