Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
EMACO for treatment of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: A multinational multicenter study

dc.contributor.authorJareemit, Nida
dc.contributor.authorTherasakvichya, Suwanit
dc.contributor.authorFreitas, Fernanda
dc.contributor.authorPaiva, Gabriela
dc.contributor.authorRamírez, Luz Angela Correa [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBerkowitz, Ross S.
dc.contributor.authorHorowitz, Neil S.
dc.contributor.authorMaestá, Izildinha [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorFülöp, Vilmos
dc.contributor.authorBraga, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorElias, Kevin M.
dc.contributor.institutionMahidol University
dc.contributor.institutionNiterói
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionHarvard Medical School
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Miskolc
dc.contributor.institutionVassouras University
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Caldas
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-29T13:38:11Z
dc.date.available2023-07-29T13:38:11Z
dc.date.issued2023-03-01
dc.description.abstractObjective: To investigate the efficacy and toxicity of etoposide, methotrexate, actinomycin D alternating with cyclophosphamide, and vincristine (EMACO) for treatment of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia, and for factors independently associated with EMACO resistance and disease-specific death in an international cohort. Methods: Medical records of GTN patients who received EMACO during 1986–2019 from gestational trophoblastic disease centers from four countries including the USA, Thailand, Hungary, and Brazil, were retrospectively reviewed. Among 335 GTN patients, 266 patients who received EMACO as primary chemotherapy were included in the primary treatment group, and 69 patients who received EMACO after relapse/resistance to single-agent chemotherapy were included in the prior treatment group. Results: Three-quarters (76.1%) of all patients achieved remission, and the survival rate was 89%. The prior treatment group had better outcomes than the primary treatment group relative to remission rate (87.0% vs. 73.3%, p = 0.014) and number of EMACO cycles to achieve remission (3 vs. 6 cycles, p < 0.001). Sustained remission increased to 87.2% in EMACO-resistant patients treated with later-line chemotherapy. Number of metastatic organs ≥2 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.33, p = 0.049) was the only independent predictor of EMACO resistance among overall patients. Interval from index pregnancy ≥7 months (aOR: 4.34, p = 0.001), and pretreatment hCG >100,000 IU/L (aOR: 2.85, p = 0.028) were independent predictors of EMACO resistance in the high-risk subgroup. The only factor independently associated with disease-specific death was EMACO resistance (aOR: 176.04, p < 0.001). Conclusions: EMACO is an effective treatment for GTN. Number of metastatic organs and EMACO resistance were the independent predictors of EMACO resistance and disease-specific death, respectively.en
dc.description.affiliationDivision of Gynaecologic Oncology Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital Mahidol University
dc.description.affiliationRio de Janeiro Trophoblastic Disease Centre Maternity School of Rio de Janeiro Federal University Antonio Pedro University Hospital of Fluminense Federal University Niterói
dc.description.affiliationPostgraduation Program in Tocoginecology Botucatu Medical School São Paulo State University - UNESP
dc.description.affiliationNew England Trophoblastic Disease Center Division of Gynecologic Oncology Department of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School
dc.description.affiliationBotucatu Trophoblastic Disease Center of the Clinical Hospital of Botucatu Medical School Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics São Paulo State University - UNESP
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Medical Centre Hungarian Defense Forces Semmelweis University National Trophoblastic Disease Center Budapest Faculty of Health Sciences University of Miskolc
dc.description.affiliationPostgraduate Program in Applied Health Sciences Vassouras University, RJ
dc.description.affiliationClinical Department University of Caldas, Caldas
dc.description.affiliationUnespPostgraduation Program in Tocoginecology Botucatu Medical School São Paulo State University - UNESP
dc.description.affiliationUnespBotucatu Trophoblastic Disease Center of the Clinical Hospital of Botucatu Medical School Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics São Paulo State University - UNESP
dc.description.sponsorshipConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2020/08830-6
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCNPq: 311862/2020-9
dc.format.extent114-122
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.12.020
dc.identifier.citationGynecologic Oncology, v. 170, p. 114-122.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.12.020
dc.identifier.issn1095-6859
dc.identifier.issn0090-8258
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85146606915
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/248233
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofGynecologic Oncology
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectDisease-specific death
dc.subjectEfficacy
dc.subjectGestational trophoblastic disease
dc.subjectMultiagent chemotherapy
dc.subjectResistance
dc.subjectToxicity
dc.titleEMACO for treatment of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: A multinational multicenter studyen
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Medicina, Botucatupt
unesp.departmentGinecologia e Obstetrícia - FMBpt

Arquivos