Logo do repositório

Is genotoxicity a suitable biomarker for monitoring anabolic-androgenic steroids exposure in vivo? A systematic review and meta-analysis

dc.contributor.authorPinto, Thiago Guedes
dc.contributor.authorMalacarne, Ingra Tais
dc.contributor.authorTakeshita, Wilton Mitsunari [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorde Barros Viana, Milena
dc.contributor.authorRenno, Ana Claudia Muniz
dc.contributor.authorRibeiro, Daniel Araki
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T20:10:46Z
dc.date.issued2025-01-01
dc.description.abstractSteroids stand for a class of hormones (natural and synthetic) known to be helpful for a number of disorders. Despite the aforementioned beneficial effects of using these hormones, anabolic-androgenic steroids (AAS) are also widely abused in a non-therapeutic manner for muscle-building and strength-increasing properties that may lead to genotoxicity in different tissues. The present study aims to understand whether genotoxicity may be a suitable biomarker for AAS exposure in vivo in both experimental animal and human studies. All studies published in PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science electronic databases that presented data on DNA damage caused by AAS were analyzed. A total of 15 articles were included in this study, and after thoroughly reviewing the studies, a total of 8 articles were classified as Strong, 6 were classified as Moderate, and only 1 was classified as Weak, totaling 14 studies being considered either Strong or Moderate. This classification makes it possible to consider the present findings as reliable. The meta-analysis data revealed a statistically significant difference in Wistar rat testis cells with AAS compared to control for tail length and % tail DNA (p < 0.001), so that the selected articles were considered homogeneous and the I2 of 0% indicated low heterogeneity. In summary, genotoxicity can be considered a suitable biomarker for monitoring AAS exposure as a result of DNA breakage and oxidative DNA damage.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Biosciences Institute of Health and Society Federal University of São Paulo UNIFESP, SP
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery School of Dentistry São Paulo State University UNESP, SP
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery School of Dentistry São Paulo State University UNESP, SP
dc.format.extent77-88
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jat.4656
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Applied Toxicology, v. 45, n. 1, p. 77-88, 2025.
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jat.4656
dc.identifier.issn1099-1263
dc.identifier.issn0260-437X
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85195165047
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/307972
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Applied Toxicology
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectanabolic steroids
dc.subjectanimal studies
dc.subjectDNA damage
dc.subjectgenotoxicity
dc.titleIs genotoxicity a suitable biomarker for monitoring anabolic-androgenic steroids exposure in vivo? A systematic review and meta-analysisen
dc.typeResenhapt
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-5057-4983[6]

Arquivos

Coleções