Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Comparative Dimensioning of Plane Timber Truss by ABNT NBR 7190:1997 Method and ABNT NBR 7190-1:2022 Method

dc.contributor.authorMenezes, Isabella Silva
dc.contributor.authorFraga, Iuri Fazolin
dc.contributor.authorMascarenhas, Fernando Júnior Rezende
dc.contributor.authorMoraes, Matheus Henrique Morato de
dc.contributor.authorCavalheiro, Raquel Schmitt
dc.contributor.authorAquino, Vinícius Borges de Moura
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Herisson Ferreira dos
dc.contributor.authorMolina, Júlio Cesar [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorLahr, Francisco Antonio Rocco
dc.contributor.authorChristoforo, André Luis
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Coimbra
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.institutionFederal University of the South and Southeast of Para
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-01T20:33:22Z
dc.date.available2023-03-01T20:33:22Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-01
dc.description.abstractWood, a renewable source and a material with excellent mechanical properties, is one of the oldest materials used in civil construction. In Brazil, its use is widespread in roof structures in the form of plane trusses. Given the Brazilian context of the growing presence of wood in structural systems, in addition to the normative updating processes, this study presents a comparison between calculation methods and possible increases in material consumption of wood for roof structure. The design methods compared are according to the recently published standard ABNT NBR 7190-1 (2022) and its previous version ABNT NBR 7190 (1997). The results were obtained via iTruss software, which includes linear-elastic structural analysis by the finite element method (FEM). It was concluded that the ABNT NBR 7190-1 (2022) presents a conservative dimensioning in relation to the previous version of 1997, favoring safety. However, there were no significant increases in wood consumption, demonstrating the efficiency of the revised version.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Civil Engineering (DECiv) Federal University of Sao Carlos
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Civil Engineering University of Coimbra
dc.description.affiliationWood and Timber Structures Laboratory Department of Structural Engineering Sao Carlos School of Engineering of Sao Carlos University of Sao Paulo (USP)
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Civil Engineering Federal University of the South and Southeast of Para
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Material Engineering Federal Institute of Education Science and Technology of Rondonia, Ariquemes
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Industrial Wood Engineering São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Industrial Wood Engineering São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
dc.description.sponsorshipConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.format.extent5207-5214
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.15376/biores.17.3.5207-5214
dc.identifier.citationBioResources, v. 17, n. 3, p. 5207-5214, 2022.
dc.identifier.doi10.15376/biores.17.3.5207-5214
dc.identifier.issn1930-2126
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85137584006
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/240803
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofBioResources
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCover structures
dc.subjectDimensioning
dc.subjectWood consumption
dc.titleComparative Dimensioning of Plane Timber Truss by ABNT NBR 7190:1997 Method and ABNT NBR 7190-1:2022 Methoden
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication

Arquivos

Coleções