Physi cochemical properti es of a bioceramic repair material-biomta
dc.contributor.author | Coaguila-Llerena, Hernán [UNESP] | |
dc.contributor.author | Ochoa-Rodriguez, Victor Manuel [UNESP] | |
dc.contributor.author | Castro-Núñez, Gabriela Mariana [UNESP] | |
dc.contributor.author | Faria, Gisele [UNESP] | |
dc.contributor.author | Guerreiro-Tanomaru, Juliane Maria [UNESP] | |
dc.contributor.author | Tanomaru-Filho, Mario [UNESP] | |
dc.contributor.institution | Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-25T11:06:32Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-06-25T11:06:32Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-09-01 | |
dc.description.abstract | This study aimed to assess the physicochemical properties of a repair material in the Brazilian market, BioMTA, in comparison to other two materials currently in use (Biodentine and MTA Angelus). The initial setting time was evaluated using Gillmore needle. The pH was measured with a pH-meter after 24 h, 3, 7, 14 and 21 days. The radiopacity was determined using the equivalence in millimeters of aluminum (mm Al) from digitized occlusal radiographs. Solubility was determined after immersion in water for 7 days. The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey tests (α=0.05). The BioMTA initial setting time (5.2 min) was lower than the other materials (p<0.05). All materials showed an alkaline pH at 21 days. At 24 h, BioMTA was the most alkaline material (p<0.05); and at 3, 7, 14 and 21 days there was no difference between BioMTA and Biodentine (p>0.05), both being more alkaline than MTA Angelus (p<0.05). The radiopacity of BioMTA (4.2 mm Al) was significantly higher compared to Biodentine (p<0.05) and lower than MTA Angelus (p<0.05). The solubility of the materials was-4.2%,-1.6% and 4.1% for BioMTA, MTA Angelus and Biodentine, respectively, with a significant difference between them (p<0.05). Therefore, it can be concluded that BioMTA displayed a shorter setting time, an alkaline pH, a higher radiopacity, and a gain in mass. | en |
dc.description.affiliation | Department of Restorative Dentistry School of Dentistry UNESP-Universidade Estadual Paulista | |
dc.description.affiliationUnesp | Department of Restorative Dentistry School of Dentistry UNESP-Universidade Estadual Paulista | |
dc.description.sponsorship | Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) | |
dc.description.sponsorshipId | FAPESP: 2018/24662-6 | |
dc.format.extent | 511-515 | |
dc.identifier | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202003163 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Brazilian Dental Journal, v. 31, n. 5, p. 511-515, 2020. | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1590/0103-6440202003163 | |
dc.identifier.file | S0103-64402020000500511.pdf | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1806-4760 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0103-6440 | |
dc.identifier.scielo | S0103-64402020000500511 | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85095126633 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/208111 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Brazilian Dental Journal | |
dc.rights.accessRights | Acesso aberto | pt |
dc.source | Scopus | |
dc.subject | Biocompatible materials | |
dc.subject | Physical and chemical properties | |
dc.subject | Root canal treatment | |
dc.title | Physi cochemical properti es of a bioceramic repair material-biomta | en |
dc.type | Artigo | pt |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
relation.isDepartmentOfPublication | 901124bf-5736-4432-b057-7c29dec84b50 | |
relation.isDepartmentOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 901124bf-5736-4432-b057-7c29dec84b50 | |
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication | ca4c0298-cd82-48ee-a9c8-c97704bac2b0 | |
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | ca4c0298-cd82-48ee-a9c8-c97704bac2b0 | |
unesp.campus | Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araraquara | pt |
unesp.department | Odontologia Restauradora - FOAR | pt |
Arquivos
Pacote original
1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
- Nome:
- S0103-64402020000500511.pdf
- Tamanho:
- 114.72 KB
- Formato:
- Adobe Portable Document Format