Logo do repositório

General Approach for Forest Woody Debris Detection in Multi-Platform LiDAR Data

dc.contributor.authordos Santos, Renato César [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorShin, Sang-Yeop
dc.contributor.authorManish, Raja
dc.contributor.authorZhou, Tian
dc.contributor.authorFei, Songlin
dc.contributor.authorHabib, Ayman
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionPurdue University
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T20:02:34Z
dc.date.issued2025-02-01
dc.description.abstractWoody debris (WD) is an important element in forest ecosystems. It provides critical habitats for plants, animals, and insects. It is also a source of fuel contributing to fire propagation and sometimes leads to catastrophic wildfires. WD inventory is usually conducted through field surveys using transects and sample plots. Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) point clouds are emerging as a valuable source for the development of comprehensive WD detection strategies. Results from previous LiDAR-based WD detection approaches are promising. However, there is no general strategy for handling point clouds acquired by different platforms with varying characteristics such as the pulse repetition rate and sensor-to-object distance in natural forests. This research proposes a general and adaptive morphological WD detection strategy that requires only a few intuitive thresholds, making it suitable for multi-platform LiDAR datasets in both plantation and natural forests. The conceptual basis of the strategy is that WD LiDAR points exhibit non-planar characteristics and a distinct intensity and comprise clusters that exceed a minimum size. The developed strategy was tested using leaf-off point clouds acquired by Geiger-mode airborne, uncrewed aerial vehicle (UAV), and backpack LiDAR systems. The results show that using the intensity data did not provide a noticeable improvement in the WD detection results. Quantitatively, the approach achieved an average recall of 0.83, indicating a low rate of omission errors. Datasets with a higher point density (i.e., from UAV and backpack LiDAR) showed better performance. As for the precision evaluation metric, it ranged from 0.40 to 0.85. The precision depends on commission errors introduced by bushes and undergrowth.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Cartography São Paulo State University, SP
dc.description.affiliationLyles School of Civil and Construction Engineering Purdue University
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Forestry and Natural Resources Purdue University
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Cartography São Paulo State University, SP
dc.description.sponsorshipNorthern Research Station
dc.description.sponsorshipU.S. Forest Service
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute of Food and Agriculture
dc.description.sponsorshipIdNorthern Research Station: 19-JV-11242305-102
dc.description.sponsorshipIdU.S. Forest Service: 19-JV-11242305-102
dc.description.sponsorshipIdNational Institute of Food and Agriculture: 2023-68012-38992
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs17040651
dc.identifier.citationRemote Sensing, v. 17, n. 4, 2025.
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/rs17040651
dc.identifier.issn2072-4292
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85219178999
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/305230
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofRemote Sensing
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectforestry
dc.subjectfuel load mapping
dc.subjectgeometric features
dc.subjectLiDAR intensity
dc.subjectmorphological approaches
dc.subjectpoint cloud
dc.subjectwoody debris
dc.titleGeneral Approach for Forest Woody Debris Detection in Multi-Platform LiDAR Dataen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-0263-312X[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-3562-4433[2]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-9039-8600[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-6423-4090[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-2772-0166[5]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-6498-5951[6]

Arquivos

Coleções