Publicação: Fate of N-15 fertilizer applied to maize in rotation with tropical forage grasses
Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Data
2019-05-15
Orientador
Coorientador
Pós-graduação
Curso de graduação
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Elsevier B.V.
Tipo
Artigo
Direito de acesso
Acesso aberto![Acesso Aberto](assets/repositorio/images/logo_acesso_aberto_simples.png)
![Acesso Aberto](assets/repositorio/images/logo_acesso_aberto_simples.png)
Resumo
Tropical forage grasses of the genus Megathyrsus and Urochloa can suppress soil-nitrification by releasing inhibitory substances, reducing N losses and increasing fertilizer N recovery of the cash crop in rotation. In contrast, ruzigrass (Urochloa ruziziensis) has been reported to decrease the yield and N accumulation of the subsequent crop and hence can affect N use efficiency and the fate of applied N. We investigated the effects of Guinea grass (M. maximum), palisade grass (U. brizantha), and ruzigrass on succeeding crop yield, N accumulation, and the fate of N-15-labeled fertilizer applied to maize (Zea mays L.) in a 2-year field experiment in Brazil. Maize was fertilized with 140 kg ha(-1) N as ((NH4)-N-15)(2)SO4 or not fertilized, and recovery of residual N-15 was quantified in the second season. Net nitrification rates through an incubation study had no differences among grasses. Nitrogen application increased maize yield and N accumulation in both seasons, whereas maize yield decreased by 9.5% following ruzigrass compared with the other forages. The grasses had no effect on N-15 recovery by maize or in the system. On average, the recovery of N-15 in maize and soil was 34% and 46% in the first growing season and 2.9% and 20% in the second season, respectively. Our results indicated that tropical perennial grasses had no differential effects on nitrification rates and the fate of N-15-labeled fertilizer in the plant-litter-soil system in the season of application nor in the subsequent crop (residual effect).
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Idioma
Inglês
Como citar
Field Crops Research. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Bv, v. 238, p. 35-44, 2019.