Logotipo do repositório

Mass spectrometry-based identification reveals the polymicrobial nature of canine urinary tract infections

dc.contributor.authorRodrigues Paschoal, Natália [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorRamos Portilho, Fábio Vinícius [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorOliveira de Almeida, Beatriz [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorFagali Arabe Filho, Marcelo [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, Carolina Aparecida [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSpessotto Bello, Thaís [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorde Lima Paz, Patrik Júnior [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPaganini Listoni, Fernando José [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGarcia Ribeiro, Márcio [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T18:57:18Z
dc.date.issued2025-01-01
dc.description.abstractCanine urinary tract infections (UTIs) are common in veterinary practice and often have a complex etiology. Typically, diagnoses rely on classical phenotypic tests or are limited to identifying the genus of the pathogen. Treatments are frequently administered without prior in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing. This study analyzed 389 urine samples from dogs with clinical signs of UTI, collected by cystocentesis, through microbiological culture. Species-level identification of bacteria and yeasts was performed using mass spectrometry, while bacterial isolates underwent antimicrobial susceptibility testing via the disk diffusion method. Of the 389 samples, 170 (43.7%) showed microbial growth, with 192 microorganisms identified. Among these, 98.4% (189/192) were bacteria, and 1.6% (3/192) were fungi/yeasts. The predominant pathogens included Enterobacteria (116/192 = 60%), enterococci (26/192 = 13.5%), and staphylococci (24/192 = 12.5%). Novel pathogens, such as Lactobacillus murinus and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, were identified as primary agents of canine UTIs. Coinfections commonly involved E. coli with either E. faecalis (5/21 = 23.8%) or S. canis (4/21 = 19%). Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid was the most effective antimicrobial (≥ 70%), followed by amikacin and marbofloxacin (≥ 60%). Observed antimicrobial resistance rates included enterobacteria (18%), enterococci (> 40%), staphylococci (18%), streptococci (30%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (60%), and other organisms (> 30%). Multidrug resistance affected 18% (34/189) of bacterial isolates. This study highlights the polymicrobial nature of canine UTIs and emphasizes concerns about multidrug-resistant bacteria. These findings contribute to improving molecular diagnostics and monitoring antimicrobial resistance in domestic animals, a critical global issue.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science (FMVZ) São Paulo State University -UNESP, SP
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science (FMVZ) São Paulo State University -UNESP, SP
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42770-025-01656-3
dc.identifier.citationBrazilian Journal of Microbiology.
dc.identifier.dimensionspub.1187479439
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s42770-025-01656-3
dc.identifier.issn1678-4405
dc.identifier.issn1517-8382
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-9433-3054
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-2682-9389
dc.identifier.orcid0009-0000-7600-9675
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC12095114
dc.identifier.pmid40208563
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105002301070
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/301136
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer Nature
dc.relation.ispartofBrazilian Journal of Microbiology
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso abertopt
dc.rights.sourceRightsoa_all
dc.rights.sourceRightsgreen
dc.sourceScopus
dc.sourceDimensions
dc.subjectBacterial multidrug resistance
dc.subjectCanine microbial etiology
dc.subjectCanine urinary infections
dc.subjectMALDI-TOF MS
dc.titleMass spectrometry-based identification reveals the polymicrobial nature of canine urinary tract infectionsen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication9ca5a87b-0c83-43fa-b290-6f8a4202bf99
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery9ca5a87b-0c83-43fa-b290-6f8a4202bf99
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-9433-3054[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-2682-9389[9]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Botucatupt

Arquivos