Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Knoop microhardness of conventional and microwaved denture base acrylic resins

dc.contributor.authorSchoeffel, Amanda
dc.contributor.authorBagio, Patricia
dc.contributor.authorSakima, Vinicius [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSoares, Simone
dc.contributor.authorNeppelenbroek, Karin
dc.contributor.authorUrban, Vanessa
dc.contributor.institutionState University of Ponta Grossa
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-29T08:28:32Z
dc.date.available2022-04-29T08:28:32Z
dc.date.issued2019-11-01
dc.description.abstractBackground: Microwave polymerization reduces the time of acrylic resin processing, but it is important to select a proper cycle to avoid overheating, porosity, and impairment to the materials' properties. Aims: To evaluate the microhardness of conventional (Vipi Cril-VC) and microwaved (Vipi Wave-VW) acrylic resins after microwave polymerization cycles and the cycles recommended by the manufacturer. It was also evaluated the effect of thermocycling on the microhardness of these materials. Methods and Materials: Specimens (n = 10) were made: 1. WB (water-bath recommended for VC polymerization); 2. M630/25 (10 min at 270 W; 5 min at 0 W; 10 min at 360 W: recommended for VW polymerization); 3. M550/3 (3 min at 550 W); and 4. M650/5 (5 min at 650 W). After 48 h in distilled water at 37°C, specimens were subjected to Knoop test under 25 g during 5 s. The same specimens were submitted to thermocycling (5,000 cycles; 5°C and 55°C; 60 s) and the microhardness was again measured. The results were analyzed by repeated measures one-way analysis of variance/Bonferroni for each material (α = 0.05). Results: For both materials, no difference was obtained for groups polymerized using the cycles recommended by the manufacturer (VC = 19.8 ± 0.9 KHN; VW = 21.0 ± 1.6 KHN) and M650/5 (VC = 19.9 ± 1.5 KHN; VW = 20.9 ± 0.8 KHN). After thermocycling, microhardness decreased in experimental cycles for VC (M550/3 = 17.0 ± 1.9 to 14.6 ± 1.2 KHN; M650/5 = 19.9 ± 1.5 to 17.8 ± 0.8 KHN) and in all microwave cycles for VW (M630/25 = 21.0 ± 1.6 to 18.3 ± 0.9 KHN; M550/3 = 17.5 ± 3.0 to 15.7 ± 2.0 KHN; M650/5 = 20.9 ± 0.8 to 18.2 ± 2.0 KHN) (P = 0.000). The lowest hardness was observed for both resins processed by M550/3 (P = 0.001). Conclusions: Both materials could be polymerized in microwave during 5 min showing hardness similar to the cycles recommended by the manufacturer. Thermocycling did not decrease the hardness of VC polymerized with both cycles recommended by the manufacturer and VW polymerized with the water-bath conventional cycle.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dentistry State University of Ponta Grossa
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araraquara Dental School São Paulo State University
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Prosthodontics and Periodontics Bauru School of Dentistry University of São Paulo, Al. Octávio Pinheiro Brisola, 9-75
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araraquara Dental School São Paulo State University
dc.format.extent927-932
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_436_17
dc.identifier.citationIndian Journal of Dental Research, v. 30, n. 6, p. 927-932, 2019.
dc.identifier.doi10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_436_17
dc.identifier.issn1998-3603
dc.identifier.issn0970-9290
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85077853838
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/228762
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofIndian Journal of Dental Research
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectDenture bases
dc.subjecthardness
dc.subjectmicrowaves
dc.subjectpolymerization
dc.subjectpolymethyl methacrylate
dc.titleKnoop microhardness of conventional and microwaved denture base acrylic resinsen
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araraquarapt
unesp.departmentMateriais Odontológicos e Prótese - FOARpt

Arquivos