Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Economic analysis of the production and recovery of green fluorescent protein using ATPS-based bioprocesses

dc.contributor.authorTorres-Acosta, Mario A.
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Nathalia dos [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorVentura, Sonia P. M.
dc.contributor.authorCoutinho, Joao A. P.
dc.contributor.authorRito-Palomares, Marco
dc.contributor.authorPereira, Jorge F. B. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUCL
dc.contributor.institutionTecnol Monterrey
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniv Aveiro
dc.contributor.institutionUniv Coimbra
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-25T11:23:36Z
dc.date.available2021-06-25T11:23:36Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-01
dc.description.abstractGreen fluorescent protein (GFP) is a useful biomolecule in biotechnology; however, its price makes its widespread application prohibitive. To overcome this issue, recently, the use of aqueous two-phase systems (ATPS) for GFP purification was proposed as an alternative platform to reduce processing costs. Aligned with this goal, this study performed bioprocess modelling coupled with economic analysis using the software Biosolve to evaluate the potential and commercial applicability of ATPS for GFP purification. This work analysed a collection of fourteen ATPS to discriminate through production costs while also incorporating the concept of product purity into the calculations. The two best systems (a PEG-based and an ionic liquid (IL)-based ATPS) were placed in a full bioprocess at different scale models (1 to 100 L) to elucidate the viability of applying ATPS at large scale. Although the results showed that the PEG-based ATPS exhibit the lowest costs (between USD 3.5x10(3).g(-1) at 1 L and USD 0.33x10(3).g(-1) at 100 L), for further developments, the inclusion of an ATPS granting a higher purity is desired for the development of simpler bioprocesses. Therefore, as a third approach in this work, a sensitivity analysis was performed to determine the impact of varying different model parameters (recovery yield, material costs discount and production titre), to elucidate the circumstances under which the IL-based system can overcome the production costs of the traditional PEG-based ATPS. The results indicate that the best cost-effectiveness approach is to improve the production titre (although it can affect all ATPS studied), as an increase from 1.33 to 3.8 g/L is enough for the IL-based ATPS to be less expensive than the traditional system at all analysed scales. This study demonstrates that ATPS can greatly reduce GFP manufacturing costs, which can potentially help to popularize new applications of fluorescent proteins that are currently mostly restricted to research kits due to their high prices.en
dc.description.affiliationUCL, Adv Ctr Biochem Engn, Dept Biochem Engn, Torrington Pl, London WC1E 7JE, England
dc.description.affiliationTecnol Monterrey, Escuela Ingn & Ciencias, Ave Eugenio Garza Sada 2501 Sur, Monterrey 64849, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista, Sch Pharmaceut Sciencies, Dept Bioproc & Biotechnol, Rodovia Araraquara Jau Km 01, BR-14801902 Araraquara, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Aveiro, CICECO Aveiro Inst Mat, Chem Dept, Campus Univ Santiago, P-3810193 Aveiro, Portugal
dc.description.affiliationTecnol Monterrey, Escuela Med & Ciencias Salud, Ave Morones Prieto 3000 Pte, Monterrey 64710, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
dc.description.affiliationUniv Coimbra, Dept Chem Engn, CIEPQPF, Rua Silvio Lima,Polo 2 Pinhal Marrocos, P-3030790 Coimbra, Portugal
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista, Sch Pharmaceut Sciencies, Dept Bioproc & Biotechnol, Rodovia Araraquara Jau Km 01, BR-14801902 Araraquara, SP, Brazil
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipFCT (Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology, Portugal)
dc.description.sponsorshipPortuguese Foundation for Science and Technology/MCTES
dc.description.sponsorshipCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2014/19793-3
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFCT (Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology, Portugal): 2014/19793-3
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFCT (Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology, Portugal): FAPESP/19793/2014
dc.description.sponsorshipIdPortuguese Foundation for Science and Technology/MCTES: UIDB/50011/2020
dc.description.sponsorshipIdPortuguese Foundation for Science and Technology/MCTES: UIDP/50011/2020
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCAPES: 001
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2016/07529-5
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2014/16424-7
dc.format.extent10
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.117595
dc.identifier.citationSeparation And Purification Technology. Amsterdam: Elsevier, v. 254, 10 p., 2021.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.seppur.2020.117595
dc.identifier.issn1383-5866
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/208879
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000580404400053
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.
dc.relation.ispartofSeparation And Purification Technology
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectAqueous two-phase systems
dc.subjectEconomic evaluation
dc.subjectGreen fluorescent protein
dc.subjectBioprocess modelling
dc.subjectIonic liquids
dc.titleEconomic analysis of the production and recovery of green fluorescent protein using ATPS-based bioprocessesen
dc.typeArtigopt
dcterms.licensehttp://www.elsevier.com/about/open-access/open-access-policies/article-posting-policy
dcterms.rightsHolderElsevier B.V.
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication95697b0b-8977-4af6-88d5-c29c80b5ee92
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery95697b0b-8977-4af6-88d5-c29c80b5ee92
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas, Araraquarapt

Arquivos