Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Repair bond strength of a CAD/CAM nanoceramic resin and direct composite resin: Effect of aging and surface conditioning methods

dc.contributor.authorMoura, Dayanne Monielle Duarte
dc.contributor.authorDal Piva, Amanda Maria de Oliveira [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authordo Nascimento Januário, Ana Beatriz
dc.contributor.authorVerissímo, Aretha Heitor
dc.contributor.authorBottino, Marco Antonio [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorÖzcan, Mutlu
dc.contributor.authorSouza, Rodrigo Othávio Assunção
dc.contributor.institutionFederal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionPrivate Practice
dc.contributor.institutionClinic for Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Materials Science
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-12T02:41:46Z
dc.date.available2020-12-12T02:41:46Z
dc.date.issued2020-05-01
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To evaluate the effect of surface conditioning methods and aging on the repair bond strength between resin composite and nanoceramic CAD/CAM resin. Materials and Methods: Twenty-four blocks of nanoceramic CAD/CAM resin (NCR) (Lava Ultimate, 3M Oral Care) (10 x 5 x 2 mm3) and resin composite (Filtek Z350, 3M Oral Care) (RC) were made, embedded in acrylic resin, polished (#600, #800, #1200) and randomly divided into 8 groups (n = 12 each) according to surface conditioning methods (air abrasion with 30-μm CoJet [CJ] or air abrasion with 50-μm Al2O3 [AB]) and aging prior to repair (without aging, 24 h in water at 37°C; with aging 6 months in water at 37°C). The blocks were air abraded (20 s, 2.5 bar, 10 mm) using a standardized device. A layer of adhesive resin (Scotchbond Universal) was applied (20 s) and photopolymerized for 20 s. RC cylinders (O = 2 mm; h = 2 mm) were then bonded to the NCR substrates using a Teflon matrix and photopolymerized for 40 s. All specimens were thermocycled (10,000 cycles, 5°C-55°C) and submitted to the shear bond test (50 kgf, 0.5 mm/min) to measure repair strength. Data (MPa) were analyzed using 3-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). Failure analysis was performed using stereomicroscopy (20X). Results: ANOVA revealed a significant effect of only the material factor (p = 0.00). The group NCR6mCJ presented bond strengths (29.37 ± 5.41) which were significantly higher than those of the NCR24hCJ (20.88 ± 5.74) and RC groups (p < 0.05). The group RC24hCJ (19.71 ± 4.21) presented the lowest shear bond strength (p < 0.05). Failure analysis revealed predominantly type B mixed failures (adhesive+cohesive in the substrate material) except for the groups NCR24hCJ and NCR6mAB, where mainly type C failure (adhesive+cohesive at the RC) was observed. Conclusion: Air abrasion with Al2O3 particles or silicatization with CoJet followed by adhesive resin application are effective surface conditioning methods for the repair of nanoceramic CAD/CAM resin with resin composite.en
dc.description.affiliationFederal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) Department of Dentistry
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationPrivate Practice
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State University (UNESP) Institute of Science and Technology, São José dos Campos
dc.description.affiliationUniversity of Zurich Center for Dental and Oral Medicine Dental Materials Unit Clinic for Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Materials Science
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State University (UNESP) Institute of Science and Technology, São José dos Campos
dc.format.extent275-283
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a44551
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Adhesive Dentistry, v. 22, n. 3, p. 275-283, 2020.
dc.identifier.doi10.3290/j.jad.a44551
dc.identifier.issn1757-9988
dc.identifier.issn1461-5185
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85085155253
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/201787
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Adhesive Dentistry
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAdhesion
dc.subjectNanoceramic resin
dc.subjectRepair
dc.subjectResin composite
dc.subjectShear bond strength
dc.subjectSurface conditioning
dc.titleRepair bond strength of a CAD/CAM nanoceramic resin and direct composite resin: Effect of aging and surface conditioning methodsen
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, São José dos Campospt
unesp.departmentMateriais Odontológicos e Prótese - ICTpt

Arquivos