Logo do repositório

Enterococcus spp. Survival through the use of standard protocol for clostridium sp. isolation

dc.contributor.authorMassoli, M. C.B. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCardozo, Marita Vedovelli
dc.contributor.authorFerroni, L. B. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCasagrande, M. F. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorNascimento, G. M. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPollo, A. S. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorIturrino, R. P.S. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-28T19:44:45Z
dc.date.available2022-04-28T19:44:45Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-01
dc.description.abstractThe genera Clostridium and Enterococcus are very different from each other, both morphologically and physiologically. Due to the high resistance by the sporulation capacity of Clostridium species, the thermal shock is a characteristic tool used for the isolation and identification of these microorganisms, this way, it would eliminate any other bacteria that did not present spores. The objective of this work is to show that Enterococcus sp. resist the temperature treatment and grow in culture media used for the isolation of Clostridium sp. For this, the present study initially attempted to identify reducing sulfite clostridia in poultry products, through the use of specific culture media and heat shock treatment. However, the PCR did not detect the presence of Clostridium sp. Then, sequencing of the 16S rDNA region was performed, which showed that the reducing sulfite colonies that were being isolated were, actually, Enterococcus spp. With this, some tests were carried out using different temperature and time combinations in the thermal shock, as well as the use of five different selective and differential culture media, in an attempt to eliminate any contaminants, but all without success, because these bacteria resisted to all modification. Therefore, the standard protocol for the isolation of bacteria of the genus Clostridium does not eliminate Enterococcus, which can lead to failures in the quantification and qualification of sulfite reducing microorganisms, a fact that can significantly affect food safety and animal health.en
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias – UNESP/FCAV
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Estadual de Minas Gerais-UEMG Unidade Passos
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias – UNESP/FCAV
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2020-1368
dc.identifier.citationRevista Brasileira de Ciencia Avicola, v. 23, n. 3, 2021.
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/1806-9061-2020-1368
dc.identifier.issn1516-635X
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85115170579
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/222445
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofRevista Brasileira de Ciencia Avicola
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subject16S sequencing
dc.subjectMicrobiology
dc.subjectPoultry farming
dc.subjectSpores
dc.subjectSulfite reducers
dc.titleEnterococcus spp. Survival through the use of standard protocol for clostridium sp. isolationen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication3d807254-e442-45e5-a80b-0f6bf3a26e48
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery3d807254-e442-45e5-a80b-0f6bf3a26e48
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-9177-3954[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-3972-0198[2]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-1564-6317[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-2404-1205[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-4251-7190[5]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-1834-8887[6]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-3408-2633[7]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Jaboticabalpt

Arquivos