Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Effects of isometric handgrip training on cardiac autonomic profile: A systematic review and meta-analysis study

dc.contributor.authorFarah, Breno Q.
dc.contributor.authorChristofaro, Diego G. D. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCorreia, Marilia A.
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Crystian B. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorParmenter, Belinda J.
dc.contributor.authorRitti-Dias, Raphael M.
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Nove de Julho
dc.contributor.institutionUNSW Sydney
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-12T01:14:11Z
dc.date.available2020-12-12T01:14:11Z
dc.date.issued2020-05-01
dc.description.abstractMeta-analyses have shown that isometric handgrip training reduces blood pressure in normotensive and hypertensive subjects. However, the effects on cardiac autonomic modulation are still controversial. Thus, the aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to analyse the effects of isometric handgrip training on cardiac autonomic modulation in normotensive and hypertensive subjects. For this, Medline, Cinhal, Embase, Spordiscus and PEdro were searched for relevant studies published until December 2018. Randomized controlled trials investigating the effect of isometric handgrip training on heart rate variability parameters were considered eligible. Parameters were obtained in time (standard deviation of all the RR intervals-SDNN, root mean square of successive differences between the normal adjacent RR intervals-RMSSD and the percentage of adjacent intervals with more than 50 ms-PNN50) and frequency domain (low frequency-LF, high frequency-HF and sympathovagal balance-LF/HF). Mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated using an inverse variance method with a random effects model. Seven trials were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis, totalling 86 participants. No significant effect was observed in heart rate variability parameters after isometric handgrip training (4 trials to SDNN: MD = −1.44 ms and 95% CI = −8.02, 5.14 ms; RMSSD: MD = −1.48 ms and 95% CI = −9.41, 6.45 ms; PNN50: MD = 0.85% and 95% CI = −1.10, 2.81%; 7 trials to LF: −0.17 n.u. and 95% CI = −6.32, 5.98 n.u.; HF: MD = 0.17 n.u. and 95% CI = −5.97, 6.30 n.u.; and LF/HF: MD = 0.13 and 95% CI = −0.34, 0.59). In conclusion, current literature indicates that isometric handgrip training does not improve heart rate variability.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Physical Education Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Physical Education Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Nove de Julho
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Exercise Physiology Faculty of Medicine UNSW Sydney
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Physical Education Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.format.extent141-147
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cpf.12619
dc.identifier.citationClinical Physiology and Functional Imaging, v. 40, n. 3, p. 141-147, 2020.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/cpf.12619
dc.identifier.issn1475-097X
dc.identifier.issn1475-0961
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85079059526
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/198486
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Physiology and Functional Imaging
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectautonomic nervous system
dc.subjectblood pressure
dc.subjectexercise
dc.subjectheart rate
dc.subjecthypertension
dc.titleEffects of isometric handgrip training on cardiac autonomic profile: A systematic review and meta-analysis studyen
dc.typeResenha
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-2286-5892[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-9917-9992[2]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-8983-3433[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-6911-7018[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-8013-5658[5]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-7883-6746[6]

Arquivos

Coleções