Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Perception of consultants, feedlot owners, and packers regarding the optimal economic slaughter endpoint in feedlots: A national survey in Brazil (Part I)

dc.contributor.authorde Andrade, Thiago Sérgio
dc.contributor.authorAlbertini, Tiago Zanett
dc.contributor.authorBarioni, Luís Gustavo
dc.contributor.authorde Medeiros, Sérgio Raposo
dc.contributor.authorMillen, Danilo Domingues [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorDos Santos, Antônio Carlos Ramos
dc.contributor.authorGoulart, Rodrigo Silva
dc.contributor.authorLanna, Dante Pazzanese Duarte
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.institution@Tech -Innovation Technologies for Agriculture
dc.contributor.institutionEmpresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-25T11:07:59Z
dc.date.available2021-06-25T11:07:59Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-01
dc.description.abstractLittle information exists regarding the optimal economic slaughter endpoint (OSE) for feedlot-finished cattle in Brazil. This study investigated the perceptions of Brazilian feeders regarding the optimal time for slaughter. A total of 52 interviews were conducted involving nutritionist-consultants (n = 23), feedlot owners (n = 21), and packer-owned feedlots (n = 8). The results showed that 65% of the interviewees used weight and fat cover, both estimated visually, to determine the moment for slaughter. Identifying the ideal time for slaughter was considered a challenge for respondents, and 85% of them recognized that their current slaughter endpoint identification method needed improvements. Regarding decision support systems, 58% of respondents reported they would purchase a computer program to help identify OSE, and 73% would be interested in incorporating a prototype of such a system into their feedlots. Carcass dressing (38%) and price (25%) were the main factors driving the feeder’s choice of meatpacker, followed by carcass premiums (10%). Meat quality was found to be an irrelevant criterion for Brazilian meatpackers in awarding both premiums (5%) and deductions (3%). Slaughter endpoint is determined subjectively by the Brazilian feeders, based on a visual evaluation of both weight and fatness.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartament of Animal Science University of São Paulo (ESALQ/USP)
dc.description.affiliation@Tech -Innovation Technologies for Agriculture
dc.description.affiliationEmbrapa Informática Agropecuária
dc.description.affiliationEmbrapa Pecuária Sudeste
dc.description.affiliationCollege of Technology and Agricultural Sciences São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Animal Science College of Animal Science and Food Engineering University of São Paulo (FZEA/USP)
dc.description.affiliationUnespCollege of Technology and Agricultural Sciences São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.format.extent745-758
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2019-0219
dc.identifier.citationCanadian Journal of Animal Science, v. 100, n. 4, p. 745-758, 2020.
dc.identifier.doi10.1139/cjas-2019-0219
dc.identifier.issn1918-1825
dc.identifier.issn0008-3984
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85096798491
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/208194
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofCanadian Journal of Animal Science
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBeef
dc.subjectCarcass
dc.subjectCattle
dc.subjectFeedlot
dc.subjectManagement
dc.titlePerception of consultants, feedlot owners, and packers regarding the optimal economic slaughter endpoint in feedlots: A national survey in Brazil (Part I)en
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.departmentZootecnia - FCATpt

Arquivos