Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Can mouth washes containing chlorhexidine 0.12% be used as synonym of a water solution of chlorhexidine 0.12%?

dc.contributor.authorSuffredini, Ivana Barbosa [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCoury Saraceni, Cintia Helena [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCollantes Diaz, Ingrit Elida [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-26T15:27:45Z
dc.date.available2018-11-26T15:27:45Z
dc.date.issued2015-04-01
dc.description.abstractChlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) is a gold standard drug in dentistry and is widely used as a reference in both in vitro and in vivo experiments. Due to ease of access, mouth washes containing CHX 0.12% are used as a substitute for aqueous CHX 0.12% solution in laboratory experiments. Additionally, it is well known that for product flavor purposes, volatile compounds are added to mouth washes formulations. Volatiles added to CHX 0.12% may improve wash's antibacterial ability. Volatiles add potency to the mouth wash formulation. Compared with an aqueous CHX 0.12% solution, it is proposed that CHX solutions and Periogard(R) would have antimicrobial activity. Antimicrobial activity was assessed in the present study via disk diffusion assays against Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sanguinis and Escherichia coli. Periogard(R) showed a significantly higher antibacterial activity in relation to CHX 0.12% (p<0.05) and a similar activity in relation to CHX 1% (p>0.05). Periogard(R) volatiles were analyzed by gas-chromatography/mass spectrometry (GCMS) and the presence of antibacterial menthol, menthone, isomenthol, menthyl acetate, trans-anethol and eugenol was verified. Finally, the use of Periogard(R) as a synonym of CHX 0.12% must be avoided, because its antibacterial activity is closely related to CHX 1%.en
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista, Ctr Res Biodivers, Extract Lab, BR-01310100 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista, Sch Dent Grad Program Dent, BR-01310100 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista, Ctr Res Biodivers, Extract Lab, BR-01310100 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista, Sch Dent Grad Program Dent, BR-01310100 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2008/58706-8
dc.format.extent367-372
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-82502015000200014
dc.identifier.citationBrazilian Journal Of Pharmaceutical Sciences. Sao Paulo: Univ Sao Paulo, Conjunto Quimicas, v. 51, n. 2, p. 367-372, 2015.
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/S1984-82502015000200014
dc.identifier.issn1984-8250
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/158460
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000359468400014
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherUniv Sao Paulo, Conjunto Quimicas
dc.relation.ispartofBrazilian Journal Of Pharmaceutical Sciences
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,214
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectMouth washes/evaluation
dc.subjectPeriogard (R)
dc.subjectChlorhexidine
dc.subjectAntimicrobials/mouth use/evaluation
dc.titleCan mouth washes containing chlorhexidine 0.12% be used as synonym of a water solution of chlorhexidine 0.12%?en
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.rightsHolderUniv Sao Paulo, Conjunto Quimicas
dspace.entity.typePublication

Arquivos

Coleções