Logo do repositório
 

Does the presence of a cantilever influence the survival and success of partial implant-supported dental prostheses? Systematic review and meta-analysis

dc.contributor.authorda Silva, Emily Vivianne Freitas [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authordos Santos, Daniela Micheline [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSonego, Mariana Vilela [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGomes, Jéssica Marcela de Luna [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPellizzer, Eduardo Piza [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGoiato, Marcelo Coelho [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T17:22:03Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T17:22:03Z
dc.date.issued2018-01-01
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To investigate if the presence of a cantilever influences the survival and success of partial fixed implant-supported prostheses, through a systematic review and meta-analysis, with additional analysis of the survival and marginal bone loss rates and prosthesis complications. Materials and Methods: The register protocol of the review in the PROSPERO database is CRD42016052008. The MEDLINE and Scopus databases were used for an electronic search of relevant studies up to November 2016, by means of two independent reviewers. The keywords included the combinations fixed partial denture with dental implants, and with extension or cantilever; and implant-supported dental prosthesis with extension or cantilever. The inclusion criteria were randomized clinical trials and prospective and retrospective clinical studies in English that addressed the comparison of success and survival of the use of implant-supported fixed prostheses, with and without cantilevers. Data from the selected studies were used to perform the statistical analysis. Results: Among the 408 articles identified, 4 articles met the eligibility criteria. The presence of a cantilever did not compromise marginal bone loss or the survival of the prostheses. However, minor complications were encountered for the group of partial fixed prostheses without cantilevers, with a statistical difference (P = .008). Conclusion: Cantilevers can be used in fixed prostheses and do not interfere negatively in the survival or success of the prosthesis or the marginal bone loss. However, there are minor complications when prostheses without cantilevers, or short cantilevers, are used.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Aracatuba Dental School Univ. Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Aracatuba Dental School Univ. Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.format.extent815-823
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.11607/jomi.6413
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, v. 33, n. 4, p. 815-823, 2018.
dc.identifier.doi10.11607/jomi.6413
dc.identifier.issn0882-2786
dc.identifier.lattes9719883814872582
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85051091233
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/176684
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants
dc.relation.ispartofsjr1,576
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restritopt
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCantilever
dc.subjectDental implants
dc.subjectExtension
dc.subjectFixed partial denture
dc.subjectImplant-supported dental prosthesis
dc.titleDoes the presence of a cantilever influence the survival and success of partial implant-supported dental prostheses? Systematic review and meta-analysisen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isDepartmentOfPublication5f53b343-da2a-4737-96ec-6e2389a6d704
relation.isDepartmentOfPublication.latestForDiscovery5f53b343-da2a-4737-96ec-6e2389a6d704
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication8b3335a4-1163-438a-a0e2-921a46e0380d
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery8b3335a4-1163-438a-a0e2-921a46e0380d
unesp.author.lattes9719883814872582
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araçatubapt
unesp.departmentMateriais odontológicos e Prótese - FOApt

Arquivos