Logo do repositório
 

Photoelastic Analysis of Stress Distribution With Different Implant Systems

dc.contributor.authorPellizzer, Eduardo Piza [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCarli, Rafael Imai [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorFalcon-Antenucci, Rosse Mary [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorVerri, Fellippo Ramos [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGoiato, Marcelo Coelho [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorVilla, Luiz Marcelo Ribeiro [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-03T13:10:43Z
dc.date.available2014-12-03T13:10:43Z
dc.date.issued2014-04-01
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate stress distribution with different implant systems through photoelasticity. Five models were fabricated with photoelastic resin PL-2. Each model was composed of a block of photoelastic resin (10 x 40 x 45 mm) with an implant and a healing abutment: model 1, internal hexagon implant (4.0 X 10 mm; Conect AR, Conexao, Sao Paulo, Brazil); model 2, Morse taper/internal octagon implant (4.1 x 10 mm; Standard, Straumann ITI, Andover, Mass); model 3, Morse taper implant (4.0 x 10 mm; AR Morse, Conexao); model 4, locking taper implant (4.0 x 11 mm; Bicon, Boston, Mass); model 5, external hexagon implant (4.0 x 10 mm; Master Screw, Conexao). Axial and oblique load (45) of 150 N were applied by a universal testing machine (EMIC-DL 3000), and a circular polariscope was used to visualize the stress. The results were photographed and analyzed qualitatively using Adobe Photoshop software. For the axial load, the greatest stress concentration was exhibited in the cervical and apical thirds. However, the highest number of isochromatic fringes was observed in the implant apex and in the cervical adjacent to the load direction in all models for the oblique load. Model 2 (Morse taper, internal octagon, Straumann ITI) presented the lowest stress concentration, while model 5 (external hexagon, Master Screw, Conexao) exhibited the greatest stress. It was concluded that Morse taper implants presented a more favorable stress distribution among the test groups. The external hexagon implant showed the highest stress concentration. Oblique load generated the highest stress in all models analyzed.en
dc.description.affiliationSao Paulo State Univ, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Aracatuba, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespSao Paulo State Univ, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Aracatuba, SP, Brazil
dc.format.extent117-122
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00138
dc.identifier.citationJournal Of Oral Implantology. Lawrence: Allen Press Inc, v. 40, n. 2, p. 117-122, 2014.
dc.identifier.doi10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00138
dc.identifier.issn0160-6972
dc.identifier.lattes5581364193525500
dc.identifier.lattes9719883814872582
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-3800-3050
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/112443
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000335631400002
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherAllen Press Inc
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Oral Implantology
dc.relation.ispartofjcr1.212
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,569
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restritopt
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectdental implanten
dc.subjectimplant systemsen
dc.subjectbiomechanicsen
dc.subjectphotoelasticityen
dc.titlePhotoelastic Analysis of Stress Distribution With Different Implant Systemsen
dc.typeArtigopt
dcterms.rightsHolderAllen Press Inc
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isDepartmentOfPublication5f53b343-da2a-4737-96ec-6e2389a6d704
relation.isDepartmentOfPublication.latestForDiscovery5f53b343-da2a-4737-96ec-6e2389a6d704
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication8b3335a4-1163-438a-a0e2-921a46e0380d
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery8b3335a4-1163-438a-a0e2-921a46e0380d
unesp.author.lattes5581364193525500
unesp.author.lattes9719883814872582
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-3800-3050[5]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araçatubapt
unesp.departmentMateriais odontológicos e Prótese - FOApt

Arquivos