Logo do repositório

Amazonian mixed-species flocks demonstrate flexible preferences for vertical forest structure

dc.contributor.authorCoddington, Charles P. J.
dc.contributor.authorCooper, W. Justin
dc.contributor.authorRutt, Cameron L.
dc.contributor.authorMokross, Karl [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorAmaral, Bruna R.
dc.contributor.authorStouffer, Philip C.
dc.contributor.authorLuther, David A.
dc.contributor.institutionGeorge Mason University
dc.contributor.institutionInstituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia
dc.contributor.institutionLouisiana State University AgCenter and Louisiana State University
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionMichigan State University
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T20:06:38Z
dc.date.issued2023-12-01
dc.description.abstractHow species interact with human-disturbed environments is a central focus of conservation biology. Within disturbed landscapes, regenerating forests have potential to provide habitat for forest species, especially as increasing amounts of primary forest are lost. As secondary forest regenerates beside primary forest, it increases habitat heterogeneity. However, relatively little is known about the influence of habitat heterogeneity on space use. In this study, we analyzed the topography and vertical vegetation structure of regenerating forest, small forest fragments, and undisturbed rainforest in the central Amazon to determine (1) how these structural characteristics influence understory mixed-species flock space use and (2) how the vegetative preferences of flocks varied across a disturbance gradient. We first used behavioral observations to quantify the vertical foraging niche of flocks and then associated variation in horizontal space use with the three-dimensional features of forest structure. Surprisingly, we found that flock space use was not consistently associated with any variable, even though available habitat differed both within and across forest types. Overall, the best predictors were elevation and leaf area density within the subcanopy (16–25 m), yet most flock foraging occurred in the midstory (6–15 m). Together, these results indicate that while flocks may have certain habitat preferences, these preferences are flexible or idiosyncratic and do not correspond to a specific vertical profile. For example, flocks spent a disproportionate amount of time in low elevations when available, but not all flocks had access to low-lying areas within their home ranges. Although other studies show flock size and diversity can be highly sensitive to habitat disturbance, mixed-species flocks demonstrate remarkable plasticity as a unit, virtually saturating undisturbed and disturbed forest at our site, as long as regeneration has passed a certain threshold.en
dc.description.affiliationBiology Department George Mason University
dc.description.affiliationBiological Dynamics of Forest Fragments Project Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia
dc.description.affiliationSchool of Renewable Natural Resources Louisiana State University AgCenter and Louisiana State University
dc.description.affiliationDepartamento de Ecologia Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Integrative Biology Michigan State University
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartamento de Ecologia Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”
dc.description.sponsorshipAmerican Ornithologists' Union
dc.description.sponsorshipConocoPhillips
dc.description.sponsorshipCosmos Club Foundation
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute of Food and Agriculture
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Science Foundation
dc.description.sponsorshipIdNational Institute of Food and Agriculture: 94098
dc.description.sponsorshipIdNational Institute of Food and Agriculture: 94327
dc.description.sponsorshipIdNational Science Foundation: LTREB-0545491
dc.description.sponsorshipIdNational Science Foundation: LTREB-1257340
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.4720
dc.identifier.citationEcosphere, v. 14, n. 12, 2023.
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ecs2.4720
dc.identifier.issn2150-8925
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85180221372
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/306589
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofEcosphere
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectavian
dc.subjectforest fragmentation
dc.subjecthabitat quality
dc.subjectleaf area density
dc.subjectLiDAR
dc.subjectmixed-species flocks
dc.subjectsecondary forests
dc.subjecttropical forest
dc.subjectvegetation structure
dc.titleAmazonian mixed-species flocks demonstrate flexible preferences for vertical forest structureen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-3961-3026[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-5390-1537[2]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-4689-1294[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-5991-3793[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-7555-3780[5]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-0052-0423[6]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-3331-6186[7]

Arquivos

Coleções