Strategies in innovation policies: A comparative study
dc.contributor.author | Silva, Elaine da [UNESP] | |
dc.contributor.author | Hassem, Alina | |
dc.contributor.author | Ottonicar, Selma Letícia Capinzaiki [UNESP] | |
dc.contributor.author | Mallavazi, Victor Silva [UNESP] | |
dc.contributor.institution | Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) | |
dc.contributor.institution | Universidade de São Paulo (USP) | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-04-28T19:29:31Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-04-28T19:29:31Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-07-31 | |
dc.description.abstract | Public policies are fundamental to innovation because they establish guidelines to encourage the development of a region and nation. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the differences and similarities between two policies of global development - the Goal 9' of Agenda 2030 and the Brazilian National Science, Technology and Innovation Strategy 2016-2022. We focused on the presence or the absence of incentives for open innovation, especially with the adoption of Hackathon, Bootcamp and Crowdfunding practices. The methodology involved a comparative study between Goal 9' of Agenda 2030 and the Brazilian National Science, Technology and Innovation Strategy 2016-2022. We used the Content Analysis method to evaluate both of those policies based on the Categorical Analysis technique. As a result, we found that both policies encourage open innovation practices, but Hackathon, Bootcamp and Crowdfunding strategies are not explicitly discussed in these policies. | en |
dc.description.affiliation | State University of Londrina São Paulo State University | |
dc.description.affiliation | São Paulo University | |
dc.description.affiliation | São Paulo State University | |
dc.description.affiliationUnesp | State University of Londrina São Paulo State University | |
dc.description.affiliationUnesp | São Paulo State University | |
dc.format.extent | 10-21 | |
dc.identifier | http://dx.doi.org/10.31637/epsir.20-1.2 | |
dc.identifier.citation | European Public and Social Innovation Review, v. 5, n. 1, p. 10-21, 2020. | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.31637/epsir.20-1.2 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2529-9824 | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85094568214 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/221597 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | European Public and Social Innovation Review | |
dc.source | Scopus | |
dc.subject | 2030 agenda | |
dc.subject | Bootcamp | |
dc.subject | Crowdfunding | |
dc.subject | Hackathon | |
dc.subject | Open innovation | |
dc.subject | Science, technology and innovation | |
dc.subject | Sustainable development goals | |
dc.title | Strategies in innovation policies: A comparative study | en |
dc.title | Estrategias en políticas de innovación: Un estudio comparativo | es |
dc.type | Artigo | |
dspace.entity.type | Publication |