Logo do repositório

Mechanical Evaluation of Two Grades of Titanium Used in Implant Dentistry

dc.contributor.authorHirata, Ronaldo
dc.contributor.authorBonfante, Estevam A.
dc.contributor.authorMachado, Lucas S. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorTovar, Nick
dc.contributor.authorCoelho, Paulo G.
dc.contributor.institutionNYU
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-26T15:28:40Z
dc.date.available2018-11-26T15:28:40Z
dc.date.issued2015-07-01
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To investigate the effect of core dental implant materials supporting single crowns on the probability of survival and failure modes. Materials and Methods: Thirty-six standard external-hex titanium implants (4.0 mm in diameter) were selected to restore single crowns and divided into two groups according to core material: commercially pure grade 2 titanium (G2) and grade 5 titanium-aluminum-vanadium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) (G5). Abutments were screwed to the implants, and standardized maxillary central incisor metal crowns were cemented and subjected to step-stress accelerated life testing in water. Use-level probability Weibull curves and reliability for missions of 100,000 cycles at 150 N and 200 N (with 90% two-sided confidence intervals [CIs]) were calculated. Polarized light and scanning electron microscopes were used to determine the failure modes. Results: Use-level probability Weibull calculations showed beta values of 0.59 (CI, 0.31 to 1.11) and 1.22 (CI 0.81 to 1.84) for G2 and G5, respectively, and significantly higher characteristic strength and Weibull modulus for G5. The calculated reliability (90% CIs) for a mission of 100,000 cycles at 150 N showed that cumulative damage would lead to survival of 45% of implant-supported crowns of G2 and 98% of G5. At 200 N the probability of survival decreased to 0.03% for G2 and 21% for G5. Abutment screw fracture was the failure mode for all groups. Conclusion: Reliability, characteristic strength, and Weibull modulus were significantly higher for Ti-6Al-4V dental implants than for commercially pure (grade 2) titanium implants. Failure modes were similar for both groups.en
dc.description.affiliationNYU, Dept Biomat & Biomimet, 345 E 24th St, New York, NY 10010 USA
dc.description.affiliationUniv Sao Paulo, Dept Prosthodont, Bauru Coll Dent, Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationSao Paulo State Univ, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationNYU, Coll Dent, Dept Periodontol & Implant Dent, Res, New York, NY USA
dc.description.affiliationUnespSao Paulo State Univ, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.format.extent800-805
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3742
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal Of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. Hanover Park: Quintessence Publishing Co Inc, v. 30, n. 4, p. 800-805, 2015.
dc.identifier.doi10.11607/jomi.3742
dc.identifier.issn0882-2786
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/158693
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000369629200008
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherQuintessence Publishing Co Inc
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal Of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants
dc.relation.ispartofsjr1,576
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectbiomechanics
dc.subjectdental implants
dc.subjectfailure testing
dc.subjectfatigue testing
dc.subjectreliability
dc.subjectWeibull curves
dc.titleMechanical Evaluation of Two Grades of Titanium Used in Implant Dentistryen
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.rightsHolderQuintessence Publishing Co Inc
dspace.entity.typePublication

Arquivos

Coleções