Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
A waterfowl seed-dispersal network from the Neotropical region is nested and modular

dc.contributor.authorSilva, Giliandro G.
dc.contributor.authorPizo, Marco Aurélio [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGreen, Andy J.
dc.contributor.authorSebastián-González, Esther
dc.contributor.authorBugoni, Leandro
dc.contributor.authorMaltchik, Leonardo
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande – FURG
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionEstación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidad de Alicante
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-29T12:51:17Z
dc.date.available2023-07-29T12:51:17Z
dc.date.issued2023-03-01
dc.description.abstractSeed dispersal by vertebrates is fundamental for the persistence of plant species, forming networks of interactions that are often nested and modular. Networks involving angiosperms and frugivorous birds are relatively well-studied in the Neotropical region, but there are no previous studies of networks involving waterbirds. Here, we describe the structure of a Neotropical waterfowl seed-dispersal network and identify the species that have an important role for the network structure. We used information on 40 plant taxa found in fecal samples of five common waterfowl species to calculate the nestedness (NODF), weighted nestedness (WNODF), modularity, and weighted modularity of the network. We found that the network was nested, with yellow-billed teal showing the highest contribution both to nestedness and weighted nestedness. Twenty-four plant species contributed positively to weighted nestedness, with Salzmann's mille graines presenting the highest influence both to nestedness and weighted nestedness. The network was modular, but the weighted modularity was not significant. These results need to be considered with caution due to incomplete interaction sampling for two species. Ringed teal, Brazilian teal, and yellow-billed teal were considered hub modular species. Among plants, beak sedges and water snowflake were considered modular hub species, while Salzmann's mille graines and spikerush were network connectors. The structure of this Neotropical waterbird seed-dispersal network differed from the only previous waterfowl network study, from Europe, which found similar level of nestedness but no significant modularity. We include several possible explanations for this discrepancy and identified priorities for future research into waterbird–plant interaction networks. Abstract in Portuguese is available with online material.en
dc.description.affiliationGraduate Program in Biology of Continental Aquatic Environments Universidade Federal do Rio Grande – FURG
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Biodiversity Institute of Biosciences Universidade Estadual Paulista
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Wetland Ecology Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC)
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Ecology Universidad de Alicante
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Biodiversity Institute of Biosciences Universidade Estadual Paulista
dc.format.extent480-488
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/btp.13202
dc.identifier.citationBiotropica, v. 55, n. 2, p. 480-488, 2023.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/btp.13202
dc.identifier.issn1744-7429
dc.identifier.issn0006-3606
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85147902378
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/246818
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofBiotropica
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAnatidae
dc.subjectaquatic plants
dc.subjectendozoochory
dc.subjectnetwork structure
dc.subjectwaterbirds
dc.subjectwetlands
dc.titleA waterfowl seed-dispersal network from the Neotropical region is nested and modularen
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-5903-4043[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-3103-0371[2]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-1268-4951[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-7229-1845[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-0689-7026[5]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-5321-7524[6]

Arquivos

Coleções