Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Which low-fusing porcelain glaze treatment technique is better to promote a vitreous surface on y-tzp ceramic?

dc.contributor.authorMiranda, Jean Soares [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMalta, Natália Veloso
dc.contributor.authorDe Carvalho, Ronaldo Luís Almeida
dc.contributor.authorAssunção E Souza, Rodrigo Othávio de
dc.contributor.authorMachado, João Paulo Barros
dc.contributor.authorLeite, Fabíola Pessôa Pereira
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionFederal University (UFJF)
dc.contributor.institutionBraz Cubas Dental University
dc.contributor.institutionFederal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
dc.contributor.institutionNational Institute of Space Research (INPE)
dc.contributor.institutionFederal University of Juiz de For a (UFJF)
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T16:54:51Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T16:54:51Z
dc.date.issued2017-01-01
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To evaluated the influence of two types of low-fusing porcelain glaze application on the surface of a zirconia ceramics stabilized by yttrium (Y-TZP). METHODS: Y-TZP specimens were divided into five groups (n=5) according the surface treatments: control (CO), no treatment was performed; application of a thin low-fusing porcelain glass layer by the powder/liquid technique (GPL); GPL followed by 10% hydrofluoric acid (HF) etching (GPL-HF); glaze spray application (GS); GS followed by 10% HF etching (GS-HF). Roughness measurements contact angle, x-ray diffraction, energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) and scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis were performed. RESULTS: ANOVA and Tukey tests revealed that GPL had significantly lower contact angle values than the other groups (GPL:50.31º; GPL-HF: 72.73º; GS-HF: 81.73º; CO: 96.48º; GS:101.30º; p=0.001). GPL-HF presented a significant higher roughness (Ra/Rq: 2658.0/3367.0 ηm; p=0.001) than the other groups (GPL: 872.1/1162.0 ηm; GS-HF: 383.0/603.6 ηm; GS: 303.4/391.3 ηm; CO: 263.4/339.1 ηm). The X-ray diffraction analysis just tetragonal phase in all groups. EDS and SEM analysis show a highest amount of silica on GPL and GPL-HF surface. CONCLUSION: the application of the low-fusing porcelain glaze by the powder/liquid technique followed by the HF etching promoted a better surface to micromechanical and chemical adhesion.en
dc.description.affiliationInstitute of Science and Technology State University of São Paulo Julio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationMaster in Dental Clinic Federal University (UFJF)
dc.description.affiliationBraz Cubas Dental University
dc.description.affiliationFederal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
dc.description.affiliationCenter of Special Technologies of National Institute of Space Research (INPE)
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Restorative Dentistry Federal University of Juiz de For a (UFJF)
dc.description.affiliationUnespInstitute of Science and Technology State University of São Paulo Julio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)
dc.format.extent174-179
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.15448/1980-6523.2017.4.28749
dc.identifier.citationRevista Odonto Ciencia, v. 32, n. 4, p. 174-179, 2017.
dc.identifier.doi10.15448/1980-6523.2017.4.28749
dc.identifier.issn1980-6523
dc.identifier.issn0102-9460
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85051257722
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/171316
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofRevista Odonto Ciencia
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,101
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectNanofilm
dc.subjectSurface treatment
dc.subjectZirconia ceramics
dc.titleWhich low-fusing porcelain glaze treatment technique is better to promote a vitreous surface on y-tzp ceramic?en
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication

Arquivos

Coleções